David Challis1, Jane Hughes. 1. Personal Social Services Research Unit, Faculty of Medicine, Dentistry, Nursing and Pharmacy, University of Manchester, UK.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Community-based care at the margin is a substitute for institutional care. Three factors are considered critical: definitions of eligibility, assessment procedures and balance of care. AIMS: To examine determinants of the margin between institutional and home-based care, review current practice, identify the implications and contribute to planning of integrated long-term care services. METHOD: A selective review was made of findings from research conducted after the community care reforms. RESULTS: Marked variability and inconsistency in eligibility and assessment processes may contribute to misplacement of frail older people. There remains capacity to shift the balance of care from institutional to home-based care within reasonable cost parameters, particularly with more integrated services. CONCLUSIONS: Greater standardisation of approaches to the determination of eligibility for social care and to assessment of need is required. Providing care at home for some of those currently entering care homes is feasible, but will require different service structures and staff roles, including specialist clinicians.
BACKGROUND: Community-based care at the margin is a substitute for institutional care. Three factors are considered critical: definitions of eligibility, assessment procedures and balance of care. AIMS: To examine determinants of the margin between institutional and home-based care, review current practice, identify the implications and contribute to planning of integrated long-term care services. METHOD: A selective review was made of findings from research conducted after the community care reforms. RESULTS: Marked variability and inconsistency in eligibility and assessment processes may contribute to misplacement of frail older people. There remains capacity to shift the balance of care from institutional to home-based care within reasonable cost parameters, particularly with more integrated services. CONCLUSIONS: Greater standardisation of approaches to the determination of eligibility for social care and to assessment of need is required. Providing care at home for some of those currently entering care homes is feasible, but will require different service structures and staff roles, including specialist clinicians.
Authors: Marijke Boorsma; Dinnus H M Frijters; Dirk L Knol; Miel E Ribbe; Giel Nijpels; Hein P J van Hout Journal: CMAJ Date: 2011-06-27 Impact factor: 8.262
Authors: Thérèse Van Durme; Olivier Schmitz; Sophie Cès; Sibyl Anthierens; Patrick Maggi; Sam Delye; Johanna De Almeida Mello; Anja Declercq; Jean Macq; Roy Remmen; Isabelle Aujoulat Journal: BMC Geriatr Date: 2015-06-18 Impact factor: 3.921
Authors: Sue Tucker; Christian Brand; Mark Wilberforce; Michele Abendstern; David Challis Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2015-07-17 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Marijke Boorsma; Hein P J van Hout; Dinnus H Frijters; Miel W Ribbe; Giel Nijpels Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2008-07-07 Impact factor: 2.655
Authors: Kerry Kuluski; Sima Gandhi; Christina Diong; Carolyn Steele Gray; Susan E Bronskill Journal: BMC Health Serv Res Date: 2016-08-13 Impact factor: 2.655