OBJECTIVES: The silicone elastomer A-2186 is a widely used maxillofacial prosthetic material. It is a pourable two-component silicone rubber cured by a platinum catalyst. Used as a prosthetic material, A-2186 has short working time and because of its hydrophobic nature, poor adhesion to non-silicone based adhesives. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the physical properties of new prosthetic materials based on methacryloxypropyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (MPDS-MF), and to compare the properties with those of A-2186. METHODS: Hardness, tensile strength, ultimate elongation, tear strength and adhesive bonding strength of MPDS-MF and A-2186 with and without additives were determined and compared. The bonding strengths of the extrinsic colorant carrier with the prosthetic materials were also determined. Statistical analyses were done using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For significant effects, post-hoc tests were done using the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The hardness of MPDS-MF is similar to A-2186. However, tensile strength, tear strength, ultimate elongation, and adhesive bonding strength of MPDS-MF are higher than those of A-2186. SIGNIFICANCE: MPDS-MF is cured by free radical thermal polymerization and crosslinking. The working time of MPDS-MF, unlike A-2186, is long. The presence of methacrylate groups in MPDS-MF enhances its adhesion to non-silicone based adhesive. Based on the present study, it appears that MPDS-MF is suitable for use in fabricating of clinical prostheses.
OBJECTIVES: The silicone elastomer A-2186 is a widely used maxillofacial prosthetic material. It is a pourable two-component silicone rubber cured by a platinum catalyst. Used as a prosthetic material, A-2186 has short working time and because of its hydrophobic nature, poor adhesion to non-silicone based adhesives. The purpose of this study is to evaluate the physical properties of new prosthetic materials based on methacryloxypropyl-terminated polydimethylsiloxane (MPDS-MF), and to compare the properties with those of A-2186. METHODS:Hardness, tensile strength, ultimate elongation, tear strength and adhesive bonding strength of MPDS-MF and A-2186 with and without additives were determined and compared. The bonding strengths of the extrinsic colorant carrier with the prosthetic materials were also determined. Statistical analyses were done using a two-way analysis of variance (ANOVA). For significant effects, post-hoc tests were done using the Bonferroni correction. RESULTS: The hardness of MPDS-MF is similar to A-2186. However, tensile strength, tear strength, ultimate elongation, and adhesive bonding strength of MPDS-MF are higher than those of A-2186. SIGNIFICANCE: MPDS-MF is cured by free radical thermal polymerization and crosslinking. The working time of MPDS-MF, unlike A-2186, is long. The presence of methacrylate groups in MPDS-MF enhances its adhesion to non-silicone based adhesive. Based on the present study, it appears that MPDS-MF is suitable for use in fabricating of clinical prostheses.
Authors: Adhara Smith Nobrega; Clóvis Lamartine de Moraes Melo Neto; André Pinheiro de Magalhães Bertoz; André Luiz de Melo Moreno; Marcelo Coelho Goiato Journal: Eur J Dent Date: 2020-10-01