Literature DB >> 11822726

Development of a protocol for evaluation of mammographic surveillance services in women under 50 with a family history of breast cancer.

J Mackay1, C Rogers, H Fielder, R Blamey, D Macmillan, C Boggis, J Brown, P D Pharoah, S Moss, N E Day, J Myles, J Austoker, J Gray, J Cuzick, S W Duffy.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Preliminary retrospective data suggest it is possible to identify impalpable breast cancer in women presenting with a family history of breast cancer under the age of 50, by using regular mammography. In consequence, this service is offered in a number of centres in the UK. The effectiveness of such a service, however, has not been fully evaluated.
METHODS: We propose to perform such an evaluation in a cohort of 20000 women under the age of 50 with a significant family history of breast cancer, given regular mammographic surveillance over 5 years. Comparison of surgical and pathological data with completed and ongoing population screening trials using analysis techniques of varying complexity will be performed to obtain an accurate prediction of future breast-cancer mortality reduction. The formal aims are: i) to estimate the difference in breast-cancer mortality in women under the age of 50 with a significant family history of breast cancer having regular mammography, compared with those not being screened; ii) to estimate the cost-effectiveness of regular mammography in this group of women, compared with no screening. The increase in health service resource use attributable to such a policy will be compared with no screening, and costed. Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of implementing the standardised mammography strategy compared with no screening will be presented in terms of the additional cost per cancer detected, per life saved and per life-year saved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11822726

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Epidemiol Biostat        ISSN: 1359-5229


  5 in total

1.  Should we use MRI to screen women at high-risk of breast cancer?

Authors:  F J Gilbert
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2005-05-24       Impact factor: 3.909

2.  Final Results of the Prospective FH02 Mammographic Surveillance Study of Women Aged 35-39 at Increased Familial Risk of Breast Cancer.

Authors:  D G Evans; S Thomas; J Caunt; A Burch; A R Brentnall; L Roberts; A Howell; M Wilson; R Fox; S Hillier; D M Sibbering; S Moss; M G Wallis; D M Eccles; S Duffy
Journal:  EClinicalMedicine       Date:  2019-01

3.  Mammographic surveillance in women aged 35-39 at enhanced familial risk of breast cancer (FH02).

Authors:  D G Evans; S Thomas; J Caunt; L Roberts; A Howell; M Wilson; R Fox; D M Sibbering; S Moss; M G Wallis; D M Eccles; S Duffy
Journal:  Fam Cancer       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 2.375

Review 4.  Should women under 50 be screened for breast cancer?

Authors:  S Moss
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2004-08-02       Impact factor: 7.640

5.  Mammographic screening for young women with a family history of breast cancer: knowledge and views of those at risk.

Authors:  S Tyndel; A Clements; C Bankhead; B J Henderson; K Brain; E Watson; J Austoker
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2008-10-07       Impact factor: 7.640

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.