Literature DB >> 11822723

Net carbon flux from agricultural ecosystems: methodology for full carbon cycle analyses.

T O West1, G Marland.   

Abstract

Agricultural ecosystems have the potential to sequester carbon in soils by altering agricultural management practices (i.e. tillage practice, cover crops, and crop rotation) and using agricultural inputs (i.e. fertilizers and irrigation) more efficiently. Changes in agricultural practices can also cause changes in CO2 emissions associated with these practices. In order to account for changes in net CO2 emissions, and thereby estimate the overall impact of carbon sequestration initiatives on the atmospheric CO2 pool, we use a methodology for full carbon cycle analysis of agricultural ecosystems. The analysis accounts for changes in carbon sequestration and emission rates with time, and results in values representing a change in net carbon flux. Comparison among values of net carbon flux for two or more systems, using the initial system as a baseline value, results in a value for relative net carbon flux. Some results from using the full carbon cycle methodology, along with US national average values for agricultural inputs, indicate that the net carbon flux averaged over all crops following conversion from conventional tillage to no-till is -189 kg C ha(-1) year(-1) (a negative value indicates net transfer of carbon from the atmosphere). The relative net carbon flux, using conventional tillage as the baseline, is -371 kg C ha(-1) year(-1), which represents the total atmospheric CO2 reduction caused by changing tillage practices. The methodology used here illustrates the importance of (1) delineating system boundaries, (2) including CO2 emissions associated with sequestration initiatives in the accounting process, and (3) comparing the new management practices associated with sequestration initiatives with the original management practices to obtain the true impact of sequestration projects on the atmospheric CO2 pool.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11822723     DOI: 10.1016/s0269-7491(01)00221-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Environ Pollut        ISSN: 0269-7491            Impact factor:   8.071


  7 in total

1.  Interannual variation in carbon sequestration depends mainly on the carbon uptake period in two croplands on the North China Plain.

Authors:  Xueyan Bao; Xuefa Wen; Xiaomin Sun; Fenghua Zhao; Yuying Wang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  The effects of rape residue mulching on net global warming potential and greenhouse gas intensity from no-tillage paddy fields.

Authors:  Zhi-Sheng Zhang; Cou-Gui Cao; Li-Jin Guo; Cheng-Fang Li
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-07-22

3.  Field-Based Estimates of Global Warming Potential in Bioenergy Systems of Hawaii: Crop Choice and Deficit Irrigation.

Authors:  Meghan N Pawlowski; Susan E Crow; Manyowa N Meki; James R Kiniry; Andrew D Taylor; Richard Ogoshi; Adel Youkhana; Mae Nakahata
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Carbon footprint of grain production in China.

Authors:  Dan Zhang; Jianbo Shen; Fusuo Zhang; Yu'e Li; Weifeng Zhang
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  To what extent can zero tillage lead to a reduction in greenhouse gas emissions from temperate soils?

Authors:  Shamsudheen Mangalassery; Sofie Sjögersten; Debbie L Sparkes; Craig J Sturrock; Jim Craigon; Sacha J Mooney
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 4.379

6.  Conservation tillage increases carbon sequestration of winter wheat-summer maize farmland on Loess Plateau in China.

Authors:  Xingli Lu; Xingneng Lu; Yuncheng Liao
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-09-05       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Land Cover Change Intensifies Actual and Potential Radiative Forcing through CO2 in South and Southeast Asia from 1992 to 2015.

Authors:  Yaoping Cui; Michael E Meadows; Nan Li; Yiming Fu; Guosong Zhao; Jinwei Dong
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-07-11       Impact factor: 3.390

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.