Literature DB >> 11822687

Implantable electrical stimulation in high-risk hindfoot fusions.

Brian G Donley1, Daniel M Ward.   

Abstract

The risk of nonunion in both the ankle and subtalar joints has been reported as high as 41% and 16%, respectively. Several factors have been reported to significantly increase the incidence of nonunion: smoking, previous nonunion, osteonecrosis, history of infection, fracture type, and major medical problems. A single surgeon's experience is retrospectively reviewed. Thirteen patients who were identified as high risk for non-union had an implantable electrical stimulator placed at the time of their ankle or hindfoot fusion along with bone grafting. Three ankle, two subtalar, six tibiotalocalcaneal, and two tibiocalcaneal fusions were performed. All 13 patients had a minimum of two major risk factors for non-union. Of the 13 patients, 11 were active smokers and five of 13 had three or more major risk factors. At a minimum of one year follow-up (average, 24.6 months), successful fusion was achieved in 12 of 13 (92%) patients. Pain scores improved from a mean of 8.5 points preoperatively (range, 7 to 10) to a mean of 1.9 points postoperatively (range, 1 to 6), while the preoperative mean modified AOFAS score of 31.2 points (range, 15 to 55) improved to 85.4 points (range, 45 to 100) postoperatively. The improvement was statistically significant at p<0.01. Eleven of 13 patients (85%) ranked their pain as a 1 or 2 out of 10, and achieved a modified AOFAS score of 80 or better. No additional procedures were done to achieve fusion. Four patients developed superficial wound infections requiring local wound care. The subcutaneous battery pack was bothersome to eight of 13 patients, painful to one, and removed in four patients. The results suggest that electrical implantable stimulation may be a useful adjunct to rigid internal fixation and bone grafting for ankle and hindfoot fusions in high-risk patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11822687     DOI: 10.1177/107110070202300103

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Foot Ankle Int        ISSN: 1071-1007            Impact factor:   2.827


  7 in total

1.  Subtalar arthrodesis stabilisation with screws in an angulated configuration is superior to the parallel disposition: a biomechanical study.

Authors:  Martin Eichinger; Werner Schmölz; Alexander Brunner; Raul Mayr; Andreas Bölderl
Journal:  Int Orthop       Date:  2015-08-08       Impact factor: 3.075

Review 2.  Complex ankle arthrodesis: Review of the literature.

Authors:  Remy V Rabinovich; Amgad M Haleem; S Robert Rozbruch
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2015-09-18

Review 3.  Electrical stimulation-based bone fracture treatment, if it works so well why do not more surgeons use it?

Authors:  Mit Balvantray Bhavsar; Zhihua Han; Thomas DeCoster; Liudmila Leppik; Karla Mychellyne Costa Oliveira; John H Barker
Journal:  Eur J Trauma Emerg Surg       Date:  2019-04-06       Impact factor: 3.693

4.  Ilizarov Ankle Arthrodesis: A Simple Salvage Solution for Failed and Neglected Ankle Fractures.

Authors:  Ajit Chalak; Sushmit Singh; Ashok Ghodke; Sachin Kale; Javed Hussain; Ronak Mishra
Journal:  Indian J Orthop       Date:  2022-06-23       Impact factor: 1.033

5.  Comparison between the effects of platelet-rich plasma and bone marrow concentrate on defect consolidation in the rabbit tibia.

Authors:  Marco Antonio Batista; Tomaz Puga Leivas; Consuelo Junqueira Rodrigues; Géssica Cantadori Funes Arenas; Donizeti Rodrigues Belitardo; Roberto Guarniero
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2011       Impact factor: 2.365

6.  Electrical stimulation in bone healing: critical analysis by evaluating levels of evidence.

Authors:  Michelle Griffin; Ardeshir Bayat
Journal:  Eplasty       Date:  2011-07-26

7.  Combining electrical stimulation and tissue engineering to treat large bone defects in a rat model.

Authors:  Liudmila Leppik; Han Zhihua; Sahba Mobini; Vishnu Thottakkattumana Parameswaran; Maria Eischen-Loges; Andrei Slavici; Judith Helbing; Lukas Pindur; Karla M C Oliveira; Mit B Bhavsar; Lukasz Hudak; Dirk Henrich; John H Barker
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2018-04-20       Impact factor: 4.379

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.