S Miilunpalo1, E Toropainen, P Moisio. 1. UKK Institute for Health Promotion Research, Tampere, Finland. seppo.miilunpalo@uta.fi
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of guidelines in Finnish primary health care units. DESIGN: A semi-quantitative analysis of a cross-sectional interview survey. SETTING: All municipal health centres in a selected region in Finland. SUBJECTS: Head physicians and head nurses of the 31 participating units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of guidelines adopted; methods used in the implementation; and the unit's estimated purposefulness in the implementation of guidelines. RESULTS: All health centres had adopted at least one guideline in the defined task areas, but only one-third of the units had implemented several guidelines. The implementation methods utilised were usually directive and passive rather than co-operative and problem-solving. Half of the units used training and methods involving active participation of the personnel, and in one-third a multiprofessional approach was applied. Clients' representatives were hardly ever involved in the adaptation of guidelines. A quarter of the health centres were assessed as purposeful in their policy to implement guidelines, the large units being more goal-oriented than the smaller ones. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of health centres are goal-oriented in the adoption of guidelines and use versatile methods to support the implementation; this presents an important managerial challenge for national health care development in Finland.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the implementation of guidelines in Finnish primary health care units. DESIGN: A semi-quantitative analysis of a cross-sectional interview survey. SETTING: All municipal health centres in a selected region in Finland. SUBJECTS: Head physicians and head nurses of the 31 participating units. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES: Number of guidelines adopted; methods used in the implementation; and the unit's estimated purposefulness in the implementation of guidelines. RESULTS: All health centres had adopted at least one guideline in the defined task areas, but only one-third of the units had implemented several guidelines. The implementation methods utilised were usually directive and passive rather than co-operative and problem-solving. Half of the units used training and methods involving active participation of the personnel, and in one-third a multiprofessional approach was applied. Clients' representatives were hardly ever involved in the adaptation of guidelines. A quarter of the health centres were assessed as purposeful in their policy to implement guidelines, the large units being more goal-oriented than the smaller ones. CONCLUSIONS: A minority of health centres are goal-oriented in the adoption of guidelines and use versatile methods to support the implementation; this presents an important managerial challenge for national health care development in Finland.
Authors: Tiina Kortteisto; Minna Kaila; Jorma Komulainen; Taina Mäntyranta; Pekka Rissanen Journal: Implement Sci Date: 2010-06-29 Impact factor: 7.327
Authors: Seija I Alanen; Riitta Johannala-Kemppainen; Jarja J Ijäs; Minna Kaila; Matti Klockars; Marjukka Mäkelä; Maritta A Välimäki Journal: Scand J Prim Health Care Date: 2007-12 Impact factor: 2.581