Literature DB >> 11822605

Analyses of vector Gaussian beam propagation and the validity of paraxial and spherical approximations.

Carl G Chen1, Paul T Konkola, Juan Ferrera, Ralf K Heilmann, Mark L Schattenburg.   

Abstract

The analysis of many systems in optical communications and metrology utilizing Gaussian beams, such as free-space propagation from single-mode fibers, point diffraction interferometers, and interference lithography, would benefit from an accurate analytical model of Gaussian beam propagation. We present a full vector analysis of Gaussian beam propagation by using the well-known method of the angular spectrum of plane waves. A Gaussian beam is assumed to traverse a charge-free, homogeneous, isotropic, linear, and nonmagnetic dielectric medium. The angular spectrum representation, in its vector form, is applied to a problem with a Gaussian intensity boundary condition. After some mathematical manipulation, each nonzero propagating electric field component is expressed in terms of a power-series expansion. Previous analytical work derived a power series for the transverse field, where the first term (zero order) in the expansion corresponds to the usual scalar paraxial approximation. We confirm this result and derive a corresponding longitudinal power series. We show that the leading longitudinal term is comparable in magnitude with the first transverse term above the scalar paraxial term, thus indicating that a full vector theory is required when going beyond the scalar paraxial approximation. In spite of the advantages of a compact analytical formalism, enabling rapid and accurate modeling of Gaussian beam systems, this approach has a notable drawback. The higher-order terms diverge at locations that are sufficiently far from the initial boundary, yielding unphysical results. Hence any meaningful use of the expansion approach calls for a careful study of its range of applicability. By considering the transition of a Gaussian wave from the paraxial to the spherical regime, we are able to derive a simple expression for the range within which the series produce numerically satisfying answers.

Year:  2002        PMID: 11822605     DOI: 10.1364/josaa.19.000404

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Opt Soc Am A Opt Image Sci Vis        ISSN: 1084-7529            Impact factor:   2.129


  2 in total

1.  Optimization of photon storage fidelity in ordered atomic arrays.

Authors:  M T Manzoni; M Moreno-Cardoner; A Asenjo-Garcia; J V Porto; A V Gorshkov; D E Chang
Journal:  New J Phys       Date:  2018       Impact factor: 3.729

2.  Plasmon-assisted optical trapping and anti-trapping.

Authors:  Aliaksandra Ivinskaya; Mihail I Petrov; Andrey A Bogdanov; Ivan Shishkin; Pavel Ginzburg; Alexander S Shalin
Journal:  Light Sci Appl       Date:  2017-05-05       Impact factor: 17.782

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.