Literature DB >> 11822011

Minimally invasive surgery.

K H Fuchs1.   

Abstract

During the last 10 years, minimally invasive surgery has influenced the techniques used in every specialty of surgical medicine. This development has not only led to the replacement of conventional procedures with minimally invasive ones, but has also stimulated surgeons to reevaluate conventional approaches with regard to perioperative parameters such as pain medication. However, two major drawbacks have emerged with the introduction of this new technique: firstly, the prolonged learning curve for most surgeons, in comparison with the learning process in open surgery; and secondly, increased costs due to investment in the equipment required and the use of disposable instruments, as well as longer operating times. In the various health-care systems around the world, these increased costs are not always compensated for by shorter hospital stays. This review focuses on major areas of indication for minimally invasive surgery in the gastrointestinal tract. These include functional disorders of the upper and lower gastrointestinal tract, obesity surgery, minimally invasive techniques in gastric and hepatobiliary surgery and in other solid organs, and laparoscopic colorectal surgery. The shortening of the hospitalization period has led to increasing use of outpatient laparoscopic surgery, and many centers specializing in day-care surgery are using these techniques. The frontiers are being pushed even further, as the size of the instruments is reduced to achieve better cosmetic results. Clinical research has also focused on the topic of expanding the indications for minimally invasive approaches in the elderly and in high-risk patients, to take advantage of the shorter hospital stays and reduced surgical trauma that are possible. A considerable amount of basic research has been carried out on the stress response during and after minimally invasive procedures, and an improved immune response with the minimally invasive approach has been observed, leading to better results after extensive oncological procedures. Robotic surgery and telesurgery involve new computer-aided methods that allow greater precision in surgical technique, as well as offering an opportunity to supply surgical skill and expertise remotely, over long distances. Minimally invasive surgical techniques are thus now fully established in routine use, and the indications are continuing to expand.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11822011     DOI: 10.1055/s-2002-19857

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Endoscopy        ISSN: 0013-726X            Impact factor:   10.093


  45 in total

1.  Training in tasks with different visual-spatial components does not improve virtual arthroscopy performance.

Authors:  P Ström; A Kjellin; L Hedman; T Wredmark; L Felländer-Tsai
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-11-21       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Robotic surgery: a current perspective.

Authors:  Anthony R Lanfranco; Andres E Castellanos; Jaydev P Desai; William C Meyers
Journal:  Ann Surg       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 12.969

3.  1990-2001 US general surgery chief resident gastric surgery operative experience: analysis of paradigm shift.

Authors:  N Joseph Espat; Evan S Ong; W Scott Helton; Lloyd M Nyhus
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2004 May-Jun       Impact factor: 3.452

4.  Collaborative eye tracking: a potential training tool in laparoscopic surgery.

Authors:  Andrew S A Chetwood; Ka-Wai Kwok; Loi-Wah Sun; George P Mylonas; James Clark; Ara Darzi; Guang-Zhong Yang
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-01-19       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  Comparison of laparoscopic versus open gastrectomy for advanced gastric cancer: an updated meta-analysis.

Authors:  Yingjun Quan; Ao Huang; Min Ye; Ming Xu; Biao Zhuang; Peng Zhang; Bo Yu; Zhijun Min
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-07-28       Impact factor: 7.370

6.  Effects of minimizing access trauma in laparoscopic colectomy in patients with IBD.

Authors:  Claudia Seifarth; Joerg-Peter Ritz; Anton Kroesen; Heinz J Buhr; Joern Groene
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-27       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  Soft tissue elastography via shearing interferometry.

Authors:  Dominic Buchta; Hüseyin Serbes; Daniel Claus; Giancarlo Pedrini; Wolfgang Osten
Journal:  J Med Imaging (Bellingham)       Date:  2018-11-02

Review 8.  [Virtual arthroscopy : Gaming or training concept of the future].

Authors:  Stephan Reppenhagen; Manuel Weißenberger; Thomas Barthel; Maximilian Rudert; Hermann Anetzberger
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2019-06       Impact factor: 1.000

9.  Design methodology for a simulator of a robotic surgical system.

Authors:  Danielle L Julian; Roger D Smith; Alyssa D S Tanaka; Ariel Dubin
Journal:  J Robot Surg       Date:  2018-11-30

10.  Laparoscopic cholecystectomy: is it a conscious preference among Turkish patients with symptomatic gallstones?--prospective study.

Authors:  Asim Cingi; Fikret Düşünceli; Bahadir M Güllüoğlu; Cumhur Yeğen; A Ozdemir Aktan; Rifat Yalin
Journal:  World J Surg       Date:  2004-09-29       Impact factor: 3.352

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.