K Tilling1, J A Sterne, C D Wolfe. 1. Department of Public Health Sciences, King's College London, Capital House, 42 Weston Street, London SE1 3QD, UK. kate.tilling@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Capture-recapture is often used to assess completeness of a register. However, the usual two-source model relies on assumptions of independence of sources and equality of capture probability which are rarely satisfied in epidemiology. An alternative is to include covariates in capture-recapture models. METHODS: We use capture-recapture models including covariates to estimate incidence of stroke in South London. We estimate ascertainment-adjusted age-standardized incidence rates, and calculate confidence intervals for incidence which allow for the uncertainty in estimation of the total number of cases. RESULTS: The crude capture-recapture model (including no covariates) underestimated the number of non-fatal strokes. Demographic and stroke severity variables were associated with the probability of capture. Including covariates led to more plausible results for fatal and non-fatal strokes, and suggested that the stroke register was 88% complete. Adjusting for under-ascertainment increased the estimated incidence from 1.31 (95% CI : 1.21-1.42) to 1.49 (95% CI : 0.38-2.60) per 1000 people. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and age-standardized incidence can be calculated using data from an incomplete register. However, sparse strata can lead to wide confidence intervals for adjusted rates. Cost-effectiveness of routine registers might be increased by using the combination of sources and covariates which most accurately estimates the total number of cases, rather than by aiming for 100% completeness.
BACKGROUND: Capture-recapture is often used to assess completeness of a register. However, the usual two-source model relies on assumptions of independence of sources and equality of capture probability which are rarely satisfied in epidemiology. An alternative is to include covariates in capture-recapture models. METHODS: We use capture-recapture models including covariates to estimate incidence of stroke in South London. We estimate ascertainment-adjusted age-standardized incidence rates, and calculate confidence intervals for incidence which allow for the uncertainty in estimation of the total number of cases. RESULTS: The crude capture-recapture model (including no covariates) underestimated the number of non-fatal strokes. Demographic and stroke severity variables were associated with the probability of capture. Including covariates led to more plausible results for fatal and non-fatal strokes, and suggested that the stroke register was 88% complete. Adjusting for under-ascertainment increased the estimated incidence from 1.31 (95% CI : 1.21-1.42) to 1.49 (95% CI : 0.38-2.60) per 1000 people. CONCLUSIONS: Incidence and age-standardized incidence can be calculated using data from an incomplete register. However, sparse strata can lead to wide confidence intervals for adjusted rates. Cost-effectiveness of routine registers might be increased by using the combination of sources and covariates which most accurately estimates the total number of cases, rather than by aiming for 100% completeness.
Authors: Matthew Hickman; Vanessa Higgins; Vivian Hope; Mark Bellis; Kate Tilling; Angeline Walker; John Henry Journal: J Epidemiol Community Health Date: 2004-09 Impact factor: 3.710
Authors: N A H Van Hest; C J P A Hoebe; J W Den Boer; J K Vermunt; E P F Ijzerman; W G Boersma; J H Richardus Journal: Epidemiol Infect Date: 2007-06-22 Impact factor: 2.451
Authors: Kristen L Kucera; Stephen W Marshall; David R Bell; Michael J DiStefano; Candice P Goerger; Sakiko Oyama Journal: J Athl Train Date: 2011 Sep-Oct Impact factor: 2.860
Authors: Juliet Addo; Siobhan Crichton; Ajay Bhalla; Anthony G Rudd; Charles D A Wolfe; Christopher McKevitt Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-04-25 Impact factor: 3.240