Literature DB >> 11821275

The influence of the depth of embryo replacement into the uterine cavity on implantation rates after IVF: a controlled, ultrasound-guided study.

Buenaventura Coroleu1, Pedro N Barri, Olga Carreras, Francisca Martínez, Mónica Parriego, Lourdes Hereter, Nuria Parera, Anna Veiga, Juan Balasch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Traditionally, embryo transfer after IVF has been performed blindly and placing the embryos approximately 1 cm below the fundal endometrial surface. However, it has been suggested that transferring embryos rather lower in the uterine cavity or high in the uterus may improve implantation rates. Nevertheless, there has not yet been a controlled trial to prove this theory. This prospective randomized study investigates the influence of the depth of embryo replacement on the implantation rate after embryo transfer carried out under transabdominal ultrasound guidance.
METHODS: A total of 180 consecutive patients undergoing ultrasound-guided embryo transfer were randomized to three study groups according to the distance between the tip of the catheter and the uterine fundus at the moment of the embryo deposition in the lumen of the endometrial cavity: group 1: 10 +/- 1.5 mm; group 2: 15 +/- 1.5 mm; group 3: 20 +/- 1.5 mm.
RESULTS: There was equal distribution between all three study groups regarding the main demographic and baseline characteristics of the patients, ovarian response, oocyte retrieval and IVF outcome, as well as the characteristics of embryo transfer and luteal phase support. The position of the catheter tip in relation to the fundal endometrial surface in groups 1 (10.2 +/- 0.9 mm), 2 (14.6 +/- 0.7 mm) and 3 (19.3 +/- 0.8 mm) was significantly different. Implantation rate was significantly higher (P < 0.05) in groups 2 (31.3%) and 3 (33.3%) compared with group 1 (20.6%).
CONCLUSIONS: The depth of the embryo replacement into the uterine cavity may influence implantation rates, and thus it should be considered as an additional procedure among factors recently proposed as associated with successful embryo transfer after IVF.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821275     DOI: 10.1093/humrep/17.2.341

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Hum Reprod        ISSN: 0268-1161            Impact factor:   6.918


  23 in total

1.  Abdominal ultrasound-guided embryo transfer improves clinical pregnancy rates after in vitro fertilization: experiences from 330 clinical investigations.

Authors:  Rong Li; Lihua Lu; Guiqin Hao; Kai Zhong; Zhiming Cai; Wei Wang
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-01       Impact factor: 3.412

2.  The pre-cycle blind mock embryo transfer is an inaccurate predictor of anticipated embryo transfer depth.

Authors:  Kristin L Miller; John L Frattarelli
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-01-11       Impact factor: 3.412

3.  Does the Presence of Blood in the Catheter or the Degree of Difficulty of Embryo Transfer Affect Live Birth?

Authors:  Torie C Plowden; Micah J Hill; Shana M Miles; Benjamin Hoyt; Belinda Yauger; James H Segars; John M Csokmay; Rebecca J Chason
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2016-09-21       Impact factor: 3.060

4.  Factors affecting assisted reproductive technology (ART) pregnancy rates: a multivariate analysis.

Authors:  Tiffany L Rhodes; Thomas P McCoy; H Lee Higdon; William R Boone
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2005-10       Impact factor: 3.412

5.  Endometrial pattern, but not endometrial thickness, affects implantation rates in euploid embryo transfers.

Authors:  Julian A Gingold; Joseph A Lee; Jorge Rodriguez-Purata; Michael C Whitehouse; Benjamin Sandler; Lawrence Grunfeld; Tanmoy Mukherjee; Alan B Copperman
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2015-06-13       Impact factor: 7.329

6.  Estradiol Level on Day 2 and Day of Trigger: A Potential Predictor of the IVF-ET Success.

Authors:  Sudha Prasad; Yogesh Kumar; Megha Singhal; Shashi Sharma
Journal:  J Obstet Gynaecol India       Date:  2014-02-27

7.  Prediction of pregnancy in IVF cycles on the fourth day of ovarian stimulation.

Authors:  J Carrera-Rotllan; L Estrada-García; J Sarquella-Ventura
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-06-28       Impact factor: 3.412

8.  Quantification of nucleolar channel systems: uniform presence throughout the upper endometrial cavity.

Authors:  Michael J Szmyga; Eli A Rybak; Edward J Nejat; Erika H Banks; Kathleen D Whitney; Alex J Polotsky; Debra S Heller; U Thomas Meier
Journal:  Fertil Steril       Date:  2012-11-06       Impact factor: 7.329

9.  The impact of the depth of embryo replacement on IVF outcome.

Authors:  Arianna Pacchiarotti; Mohamed A Mohamed; Giulietta Micara; Daniela Tranquilli; Antonella Linari; Salomè M B Espinola; Cesare Aragona
Journal:  J Assist Reprod Genet       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 3.412

10.  The Maribor consensus: report of an expert meeting on the development of performance indicators for clinical practice in ART.

Authors:  Veljko Vlaisavljevic; Susanna Apter; Antonio Capalbo; Arianna D'Angelo; Luca Gianaroli; Georg Griesinger; Efstratios M Kolibianakis; George Lainas; Tonko Mardesic; Tatjana Motrenko; Sari Pelkonen; Daniela Romualdi; Nathalie Vermeulen; Kelly Tilleman
Journal:  Hum Reprod Open       Date:  2021-07-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.