BACKGROUND: Withholding gonadotrophin administration and postponing HCG injection, termed coasting, has been suggested as a treatment modality in cases of impending ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). It presents an opportunity to reduce the risk of OHSS and salvage the treatment, without apparent compromise to outcome. However, the duration of the coasting period, which would maintain the advantage without reducing conception rate, has not been fully established. In this retrospective study, we attempted to define the optimal interval of coasting in patients at risk of developing OHSS. METHODS: Patients were grouped according to the number of days elapsed between cessation of gonadotrophins and administration of HCG. Overall, out of 207 patients (mean age 30.76 +/- 0.33 years) coasting lasted 1 day in 39 cycles (18.8%), 2 days in 61 cycles (29.4%), 3 days in 49 cycles (23.6%) and > or = 4 days in the remaining 58 cycles (28.5%). RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in patients' age, serum estradiol concentrations at the time of HCG administration, oocyte maturity, fertilization and embryo cleavage rates. However, patients in whom coasting lasted > or = 4 days had significantly reduced implantation (10.5%) and pregnancy (26.7%) rates compared with patients with a shorter coasting interval (ranges 18.4-27.9 and 41-55.7% respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Coasting for >3 days appears to reduce implantation and pregnancy rates while in-vitro oocyte and embryo quality do not appear to be affected. We suggest that in patients who need coasting for >3 days, cryopreservation of embryos should be considered.
BACKGROUND: Withholding gonadotrophin administration and postponing HCG injection, termed coasting, has been suggested as a treatment modality in cases of impending ovarian hyperstimulation syndrome (OHSS). It presents an opportunity to reduce the risk of OHSS and salvage the treatment, without apparent compromise to outcome. However, the duration of the coasting period, which would maintain the advantage without reducing conception rate, has not been fully established. In this retrospective study, we attempted to define the optimal interval of coasting in patients at risk of developing OHSS. METHODS:Patients were grouped according to the number of days elapsed between cessation of gonadotrophins and administration of HCG. Overall, out of 207 patients (mean age 30.76 +/- 0.33 years) coasting lasted 1 day in 39 cycles (18.8%), 2 days in 61 cycles (29.4%), 3 days in 49 cycles (23.6%) and > or = 4 days in the remaining 58 cycles (28.5%). RESULTS: There was no difference between the groups in patients' age, serum estradiol concentrations at the time of HCG administration, oocyte maturity, fertilization and embryo cleavage rates. However, patients in whom coasting lasted > or = 4 days had significantly reduced implantation (10.5%) and pregnancy (26.7%) rates compared with patients with a shorter coasting interval (ranges 18.4-27.9 and 41-55.7% respectively; P < 0.05). CONCLUSION: Coasting for >3 days appears to reduce implantation and pregnancy rates while in-vitro oocyte and embryo quality do not appear to be affected. We suggest that in patients who need coasting for >3 days, cryopreservation of embryos should be considered.
Authors: Micah J Hill; Rebecca J Chason; Mark D Payson; James H Segars; John M Csokmay Journal: Reprod Biomed Online Date: 2012-05-23 Impact factor: 3.828
Authors: Kathryn Coyne; MacKenzie Purdy; Kathleen O'Leary; Jerome L Yaklic; Steven R Lindheim; Leslie A Appiah Journal: Front Public Health Date: 2014-12-05
Authors: Mustafa Acet; Lebriz Hale Aktün; Serdar Başaranoğlu; Betül Yorgunlar; Tuba Acet; Aysegul Deregözü Journal: Med Sci Monit Basic Res Date: 2015-11-30