Literature DB >> 11821077

Assessment of DNA fragmentation of spermatozoa that were surgically retrieved from men with obstructive azoospermia.

Liliana Ramos1, Peter Kleingeld, Eric Meuleman, Roelof van Kooy, Jan Kremer, Didi Braat, Alex Wetzels.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To determine the degree of DNA fragmentation in spermatozoa of men with obstructive azoospermia or anejaculation compared with that of ejaculated spermatozoa from fertile donors.
DESIGN: Observational study. SETTING; University Medical Center St. Radboud, Nijmegen. The Netherlands. PATIENT(S): Forty-one patients with obstructive azoospermia or anejaculation and 10 fertile donors. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURE(S): Sperm samples were obtained surgically from the epididymis or testis of men with azoospermia or anejeculation and by ejaculation in fertile patients. DNA fragmentation was analyzed in the total sample and in a motile fraction that was isolated as in routine ICSI procedures. DNA breaks were measured by using the TdT-mediated dUTP nick-end labeling assay. RESULT(S): A higher percentage of cells with DNA breaks was found in men with obstructive azoospermia or anejaculation compared with donors (mean, 18.9% vs. 6.2%). A significant lower degree of DNA fragmentation was observed in the motile fraction from patients compared with donors (0.4% vs. 0.6%). CONCLUSION(S): High percentages of cells with DNA damage were found in sperm samples from men with obstructive azoospermia or anejaculation, but a very low frequency of damage to the DNA was observed in the motile fraction. In an ICSI setting, the use of motile sperm retrieved from epididymis or testis of men with obstructive azoospermia does not seem to pose a higher genetic risk to the progeny than does use of motile ejaculated sperm.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11821077     DOI: 10.1016/s0015-0282(01)02962-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Fertil Steril        ISSN: 0015-0282            Impact factor:   7.329


  5 in total

1.  Different sperm sources and parameters can influence intracytoplasmic sperm injection outcomes before embryo implantation.

Authors:  Yue-hong Lu; Hui-juan Gao; Bai-jia Li; Ying-ming Zheng; Ying-hui Ye; Yu-li Qian; Chen-ming Xu; He-feng Huang; Fan Jin
Journal:  J Zhejiang Univ Sci B       Date:  2012-01       Impact factor: 3.066

Review 2.  Male Factors: the Role of Sperm in Preimplantation Embryo Quality.

Authors:  Zahra Bashiri; Fardin Amidi; Iraj Amiri; Zahra Zandieh; Chad B Maki; Fatemeh Mohammadi; Sadegh Amiri; Morteza Koruji
Journal:  Reprod Sci       Date:  2020-11-02       Impact factor: 3.060

Review 3.  Measuring Sperm DNA Fragmentation and Clinical Outcomes of Medically Assisted Reproduction: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Maartje Cissen; Madelon van Wely; Irma Scholten; Steven Mansell; Jan Peter de Bruin; Ben Willem Mol; Didi Braat; Sjoerd Repping; Geert Hamer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-11-10       Impact factor: 3.240

Review 4.  Predictive factors for sperm retrieval and sperm injection outcomes in obstructive azoospermia: do etiology, retrieval techniques and gamete source play a role?

Authors:  Ricardo Miyaoka; Sandro C Esteves
Journal:  Clinics (Sao Paulo)       Date:  2013       Impact factor: 2.365

5.  Superior clinical pregnancy rates after microsurgical epididymal sperm aspiration.

Authors:  Hatsuki Hibi; Makoto Sumitomo; Noritaka Fukunaga; Megumi Sonohara; Yoshimasa Asada
Journal:  Reprod Med Biol       Date:  2017-10-31
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.