OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae on cell-mediated immunity and on treating patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS:Seventy cases of pulmonary tuberculosis with smear positive and initial treatment were classified randomly into group I (35 cases) and group II (35 cases), receiving 2HRZS/4HR and 2HRZS/4HR plus vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae regimens respectively. Thirty-one multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis cases were classified into group III, receiving 4 - 6 sensitive antituberculous drugs and vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae. Improvement of clinical symptoms, resolution of pulmonary lesions, negative conversion of sputum and changes of immunological functions were observed. RESULTS: No significant difference in improvement of symptoms was found in group I and group II (P > 0.05), and the improvement rate of clinical symptoms in group III was found more than 50%. X-ray resolution rates in 4th month were 83% and 89%, and cavity reducing rates 40% and 50% respectively in group I and group II, and no significant differences were found (P > 0.05). X-ray resolution rate was 29%, cavity reducing rate 7% and no deteriorated case was found in group III. Sputum negative conversion rates in 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th month were 23%, 51%, 83% and 97% respectively in group I, while 31%, 77%, 89% and 100% in group II, and 3%, 16%, 29% and 32% in group III. Significant difference was found between group I and group II in sputum negative conversion rate in 2nd month after treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, values of lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), CD(3), CD(4) and CD(4)/CD(8) of the above 3 groups were all higher than that before the treatment (P < 0.05), level of tumor necrosis factor decreased in group II and IL-2, IL-6 increased in group III. CONCLUSIONS:Vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae is a good immunotherapy preparation, which promotes sputum negative conversion and activation of cell-mediated immunity.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: To study the effect of vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae on cell-mediated immunity and on treating patients with pulmonary tuberculosis. METHODS: Seventy cases of pulmonary tuberculosis with smear positive and initial treatment were classified randomly into group I (35 cases) and group II (35 cases), receiving 2HRZS/4HR and 2HRZS/4HR plus vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae regimens respectively. Thirty-one multi-drug resistant pulmonary tuberculosis cases were classified into group III, receiving 4 - 6 sensitive antituberculous drugs and vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae. Improvement of clinical symptoms, resolution of pulmonary lesions, negative conversion of sputum and changes of immunological functions were observed. RESULTS: No significant difference in improvement of symptoms was found in group I and group II (P > 0.05), and the improvement rate of clinical symptoms in group III was found more than 50%. X-ray resolution rates in 4th month were 83% and 89%, and cavity reducing rates 40% and 50% respectively in group I and group II, and no significant differences were found (P > 0.05). X-ray resolution rate was 29%, cavity reducing rate 7% and no deteriorated case was found in group III. Sputum negative conversion rates in 1st, 2nd, 3rd and 4th month were 23%, 51%, 83% and 97% respectively in group I, while 31%, 77%, 89% and 100% in group II, and 3%, 16%, 29% and 32% in group III. Significant difference was found between group I and group II in sputum negative conversion rate in 2nd month after treatment (P < 0.05). After treatment, values of lymphocyte transformation test (LTT), CD(3), CD(4) and CD(4)/CD(8) of the above 3 groups were all higher than that before the treatment (P < 0.05), level of tumor necrosis factor decreased in group II and IL-2, IL-6 increased in group III. CONCLUSIONS: Vaccine of Mycobacterium vaccae is a good immunotherapy preparation, which promotes sputum negative conversion and activation of cell-mediated immunity.
Authors: Yuri V Efremenko; Dmytro A Butov; Natalia D Prihoda; Svetlana I Zaitzeva; Larisa V Yurchenko; Nina I Sokolenko; Tetyana S Butova; Anna L Stepanenko; Galyna A Kutsyna; Vichai Jirathitikal; Aldar S Bourinbaiar Journal: Hum Vaccin Immunother Date: 2013-06-19 Impact factor: 3.452