Literature DB >> 11820750

Cognitive demands of face monitoring: evidence for visuospatial overload.

G Doherty-Sneddon1, L Bonner, V Bruce.   

Abstract

Young children perform difficult communication tasks better face to face than when they cannot see one another (e.g., Doherty-Sneddon & Kent, 1996). However, in recent studies, it was found that children aged 6 and 10 years, describing abstract shapes, showed evidence of face-to-face interference rather than facilitation. For some communication tasks, access to visual signals (such as facial expression and eye gaze) may hinder rather than help children's communication. In new research we have pursued this interference effect. Five studies are described with adults and 10- and 6-year-old participants. It was found that looking at a face interfered with children's abilities to listen to descriptions of abstract shapes. Children also performed visuospatial memory tasks worse when they looked at someone's face prior to responding than when they looked at a visuospatial pattern or at the floor. It was concluded that performance on certain tasks was hindered by monitoring another person's face. It is suggested that processing of visual communication signals shares certain processing resources with the processing of other visuospatial information.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11820750     DOI: 10.3758/bf03195753

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Mem Cognit        ISSN: 0090-502X


  14 in total

1.  You must see the point: automatic processing of cues to the direction of social attention.

Authors:  S R Langton; V Bruce
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2000-04       Impact factor: 3.332

2.  Development of memory for pattern and path: further evidence for the fractionation of visuo-spatial memory.

Authors:  S J Pickering; S E Gathercole; M Hall; S A Lloyd
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2001-05

3.  The mutual influence of gaze and head orientation in the analysis of social attention direction.

Authors:  S R Langton
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  2000-08

4.  Beyond words: the importance of gesture to researchers and learners.

Authors:  S Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Child Dev       Date:  2000 Jan-Feb

5.  Organization and functions of cells responsive to faces in the temporal cortex.

Authors:  D I Perrett; J K Hietanen; M W Oram; P J Benson
Journal:  Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci       Date:  1992-01-29       Impact factor: 6.237

Review 6.  The Corsi block-tapping task: methodological and theoretical considerations.

Authors:  D B Berch; R Krikorian; E M Huha
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  1998-12       Impact factor: 2.310

7.  Averting the gaze disengages the environment and facilitates remembering.

Authors:  A M Glenberg; J L Schroeder; D A Robertson
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  1998-07

8.  The mismatch between gesture and speech as an index of transitional knowledge.

Authors:  R B Church; S Goldin-Meadow
Journal:  Cognition       Date:  1986-06

9.  Impairment of the visuo-spatial sketch pad.

Authors:  J R Hanley; A W Young; N A Pearson
Journal:  Q J Exp Psychol A       Date:  1991-02

10.  Visual signals and the communication abilities of children.

Authors:  G Doherty-Sneddon; G Kent
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  1996-11       Impact factor: 8.982

View more
  15 in total

1.  Development of audiovisual comprehension skills in prelingually deaf children with cochlear implants.

Authors:  Tonya R Bergeson; David B Pisoni; Rebecca A O Davis
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2005-04       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  Eye closure helps memory by reducing cognitive load and enhancing visualisation.

Authors:  Annelies Vredeveldt; Graham J Hitch; Alan D Baddeley
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2011-10

3.  Intentionally distracting: Working memory is disrupted by the perception of other agents attending to you - even without eye-gaze cues.

Authors:  Clara Colombatto; Benjamin van Buren; Brian J Scholl
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2019-06

4.  Effects of simultaneous speech and sign on infants' attention to spoken language.

Authors:  Jonathan Y Ting; Tonya R Bergeson; Richard T Miyamoto
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2012-10-01       Impact factor: 3.325

5.  Informational masking of speech in children: auditory-visual integration.

Authors:  Frederic Wightman; Doris Kistler; Douglas Brungart
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2006-06       Impact factor: 1.840

6.  Looking Behavior and Audiovisual Speech Understanding in Children With Normal Hearing and Children With Mild Bilateral or Unilateral Hearing Loss.

Authors:  Dawna E Lewis; Nicholas A Smith; Jody L Spalding; Daniel L Valente
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2018 Jul/Aug       Impact factor: 3.570

7.  Gaze aversion: a response to cognitive or social difficulty?

Authors:  G Doherty-Sneddon; F G Phelps
Journal:  Mem Cognit       Date:  2005-06

8.  Effect of perceptual load on semantic access by speech in children.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Candice Mills; James Bartlett; Nancy Tye-Murray; Hervé Abdi
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2012-08-15       Impact factor: 2.297

9.  Developmental shifts in children's sensitivity to visual speech: a new multimodal picture-word task.

Authors:  Susan Jerger; Markus F Damian; Melanie J Spence; Nancy Tye-Murray; Herve Abdi
Journal:  J Exp Child Psychol       Date:  2008-10-01

10.  Gaze aversion as a cognitive load management strategy in autism spectrum disorder and Williams syndrome.

Authors:  Gwyneth Doherty-Sneddon; Deborah M Riby; Lisa Whittle
Journal:  J Child Psychol Psychiatry       Date:  2011-10-26       Impact factor: 8.982

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.