Literature DB >> 11820689

The influence of crank rate on peak oxygen consumption during arm crank ergometry.

P M Smith1, M J Price, M Doherty.   

Abstract

The aim of this study was to assess the influence of three imposed crank rates on the attainment of peak oxygen consumption (VO2peak) and other physiological responses during incremental arm crank ergometry. Twenty physically active, although non-specifically trained, males volunteered for the study. They completed an exercise protocol using an electrically braked arm ergometer (Lode Angio, Groningen, Netherlands) at crank rates of 60, 70 and 80 rev x min(-1). The order of tests was randomized and they were separated by at least 2 days. Peak VO2 was significantly higher (P < 0.05) at 70 and 80 rev x min(-1) than at 60 rev x min(-1). Peak ventilation volume increased as a function of crank rate and was higher (P < 0.05) at 80 than at 60 rev x min(-1). Peak heart rate was higher (P < 0.05) at 70 and 80 rev x min(-1) than at 60 rev x min(-1). Furthermore, 70 and 80 rev x min(-1) resulted in an extended test time compared with 60 rev x min(-1). The greater physiological responses observed during the tests at the two faster crank rates might have been the result of a postponement of acute localized neuromuscular fatigue, allowing for more work to be completed. We recommend, therefore, that an imposed crank rate between 70 and 80 rev x min(-1) should be used to elicit VO2peak and other physiological responses in arm crank ergometry.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11820689     DOI: 10.1080/026404101317108453

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sports Sci        ISSN: 0264-0414            Impact factor:   3.337


  14 in total

Review 1.  Energy expenditure and metabolism during exercise in persons with a spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Michael Price
Journal:  Sports Med       Date:  2010-08-01       Impact factor: 11.136

2.  The aerobic performance of trained and untrained handcyclists with spinal cord injury.

Authors:  Dale Lovell; Darron Shields; Belinda Beck; Ross Cuneo; Chris McLellan
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2012-01-26       Impact factor: 3.078

3.  Aerobic power and peak power of elite America's Cup sailors.

Authors:  Vernon Neville; Matthew T G Pain; Jonathan P Folland
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2009-02-21       Impact factor: 3.078

4.  Peak and submaximal steady-state metabolic and cardiorespiratory responses during arm-powered and arm-trunk-powered handbike ergometry in able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Joeri Verellen; Christophe Meyer; Luc Janssens; Yves Vanlandewijck
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.078

5.  Validation of an Arm Crank Ergometer Test for Use in Sedentary Adults.

Authors:  Alexandros Mitropoulos; Anil Gumber; Helen Crank; Markos Klonizakis
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2017-12-01       Impact factor: 2.988

6.  Arm vs. Combined Leg and Arm Exercise: Blood Pressure Responses and Ratings of Perceived Exertion at the Same Indirectly Determined Heart Rate.

Authors:  Andrea Di Blasio; Andrea Sablone; Paola Civino; Emanuele D'Angelo; Sabina Gallina; Patrizio Ripari
Journal:  J Sports Sci Med       Date:  2009-09-01       Impact factor: 2.988

7.  Lactate kinetics in handcycling under various exercise modalities and their relationship to performance measures in able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Oliver J Quittmann; Thomas Abel; Sebastian Zeller; Tina Foitschik; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2018-05-03       Impact factor: 3.078

8.  Biomechanics of handcycling propulsion in a 30-min continuous load test at lactate threshold: Kinetics, kinematics, and muscular activity in able-bodied participants.

Authors:  Oliver J Quittmann; Thomas Abel; Kirsten Albracht; Joshua Meskemper; Tina Foitschik; Heiko K Strüder
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2020-04-18       Impact factor: 3.078

9.  Prediction of upper extremity peak oxygen consumption from heart rate during submaximal arm cycling in young and middle-aged adults.

Authors:  Jan Helgerud; Britt Elin Øiestad; Eivind Wang; Jan Hoff
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2019-10-04       Impact factor: 3.078

10.  Effect of cadence on locomotor-respiratory coupling during upper-body exercise.

Authors:  Nicholas B Tiller; Mike J Price; Ian G Campbell; Lee M Romer
Journal:  Eur J Appl Physiol       Date:  2016-12-28       Impact factor: 3.078

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.