Literature DB >> 11820228

A pluralistic evaluation of nursing/practice development units.

K Gerrish1.   

Abstract

Nursing/practice development units (N/PDU) are perceived as centres for pioneering, evaluating and disseminating innovative practice development and facilitating the professional development of practitioners. This paper reports on a pluralistic evaluation research study of the nursing/ practice development unit accreditation programme provided by the University of Leeds, UK. Individual and focus group interviews were undertaken with key stakeholders involved in six nursing/practice development units. These included: clinical leaders, team members, executive nurses, trust board members, general medical practitioners, nursing/practice development unit steering group members, and accreditation panel members. Stakeholder perceptions of what constituted a successful nursing/practice development unit were elicited and then used to judge the success of the programme. Seven criteria for judging the success of nursing/practice development units were identified. These were: achieving optimum practice; providing a patient-orientated service; disseminating innovative practice; team working; enabling practitioners to develop their full potential; adopting a strategic approach to change and autonomous functioning. The findings highlighted differences between the rhetoric of a successful nursing/practice development unit and the reality in which they function. Whereas all the units were actively involved in innovative practice development, evaluation, dissemination and networking activities, several factors influenced the success of the units, in particular, the role of the clinical leader, the motivation and commitment of nursing/practice development unit members, financial resources, and the nature of support from managers, medical staff and education institutions. Although the nursing/practice development units had made significant progress in developing both healthcare practice and practitioners, there is still a need to consider how the claim that nursing/practice development units benefit patients can be substantiated.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11820228     DOI: 10.1046/j.1365-2702.2001.00439.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Clin Nurs        ISSN: 0962-1067            Impact factor:   3.036


  4 in total

1.  Treatment of minor illness in primary care: a national survey of patient satisfaction, attitudes and preferences regarding a wider nursing role.

Authors:  Jan Caldow; Christine Bond; Mandy Ryan; Neil C Campbell; Fernando San Miguel; Alice Kiger; Amanda Lee
Journal:  Health Expect       Date:  2007-03       Impact factor: 3.377

2.  Bridging the gap between research and clinical care: strategies to increase staff awareness and engagement in clinical research.

Authors:  Maggie Shepherd; Ruth Endacott; Helen Quinn
Journal:  J Res Nurs       Date:  2022-04-01

Review 3.  A realist review of interventions and strategies to promote evidence-informed healthcare: a focus on change agency.

Authors:  Brendan McCormack; Joanne Rycroft-Malone; Kara Decorby; Alison M Hutchinson; Tracey Bucknall; Bridie Kent; Alyce Schultz; Erna Snelgrove-Clarke; Cheyl Stetler; Marita Titler; Lars Wallin; Valerie Wilson
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 7.327

4.  Improving capacity in ethnicity and health research: report of a tailored programme for NHS Public Health practitioners.

Authors:  Sarah Salway; Hilary Piercy; Punita Chowbey; Louise Brewins; Permjeet Dhoot
Journal:  Prim Health Care Res Dev       Date:  2012-08-13       Impact factor: 1.458

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.