AIM: To correlate the length of the telomere to microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of APC, MCC and DCC genes in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: Telomeric restriction fragment (TRF) length of gastric cancer was measured with Southern blot. LOH of APC, MCC and DCC genes, microsatellite instability (MSI) and frameshift mutation of hMSH6, TGF-betaRII and BAX genes were analyzed by PCR-based methods. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cases of sporadic gastric carcinoma were studied for MSI using five microsatellite markers. MSI in at least one locus was detected in 17 (25%) of 68 tumors analyzed. Frameshift mutations of hMSH6, TGF-betaRII and BAX were detected in 2,6 and 3 of gastric carcinomas respectively showing high MSI (> or = 2 loci, n = 8), but none was found in those showing low MSI (only one locus, n = 9) or MSS (tumor lacking MSI or stable, n = 51). Thirty-five cases, including all high MSI and low MSI, were studied for TRF. The mean TRF length was not correlated with clinicopathological parameters. No association was observed between TRF length and MSI or frameshift mutation. On the contrary, LOH at the DCC locus was related to telomere shortening (P<0.01). This tendency was also observed in APC and MCC genes, although there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The development of gastric cancer can arise through two different genetic pathways. In high MSI gastric cancers, defective mismatch repair allows mutations to accumulate and generate the high MSI phenotype. In gastric cancers showing either low MSI or MSS, multiple deletions may represent the LOH pathway. Telomere erosion is independent of high MSI phenotype but related to the LOH pathway in gastric cancer.
AIM: To correlate the length of the telomere to microsatellite instability (MSI) and loss of heterozygosity (LOH) of APC, MCC and DCC genes in gastric carcinomas. METHODS: Telomeric restriction fragment (TRF) length of gastric cancer was measured with Southern blot. LOH of APC, MCC and DCC genes, microsatellite instability (MSI) and frameshift mutation of hMSH6, TGF-betaRII and BAX genes were analyzed by PCR-based methods. RESULTS: Sixty-eight cases of sporadic gastric carcinoma were studied for MSI using five microsatellite markers. MSI in at least one locus was detected in 17 (25%) of 68 tumors analyzed. Frameshift mutations of hMSH6, TGF-betaRII and BAX were detected in 2,6 and 3 of gastric carcinomas respectively showing high MSI (> or = 2 loci, n = 8), but none was found in those showing low MSI (only one locus, n = 9) or MSS (tumor lacking MSI or stable, n = 51). Thirty-five cases, including all high MSI and low MSI, were studied for TRF. The mean TRF length was not correlated with clinicopathological parameters. No association was observed between TRF length and MSI or frameshift mutation. On the contrary, LOH at the DCC locus was related to telomere shortening (P<0.01). This tendency was also observed in APC and MCC genes, although there was no statistical significance. CONCLUSION: The development of gastric cancer can arise through two different genetic pathways. In high MSI gastric cancers, defective mismatch repair allows mutations to accumulate and generate the high MSI phenotype. In gastric cancers showing either low MSI or MSS, multiple deletions may represent the LOH pathway. Telomere erosion is independent of high MSI phenotype but related to the LOH pathway in gastric cancer.
Authors: K K Wong; S Chang; S R Weiler; S Ganesan; J Chaudhuri; C Zhu; S E Artandi; K L Rudolph; G J Gottlieb; L Chin; F W Alt; R A DePinho Journal: Nat Genet Date: 2000-09 Impact factor: 38.330
Authors: J Yin; D Kong; S Wang; T T Zou; R F Souza; K N Smolinski; P M Lynch; S R Hamilton; H Sugimura; S M Powell; J Young; J M Abraham; S J Meltzer Journal: Hum Mutat Date: 1997 Impact factor: 4.878
Authors: S Takagi; Y Kinouchi; N Hiwatashi; M Chida; F Nagashima; S Takahashi; K Negoro; T Shimosegawa; T Toyota Journal: Cancer Date: 1999-10-15 Impact factor: 6.860
Authors: K Hiyama; S Ishioka; Y Shirotani; K Inai; E Hiyama; I Murakami; T Isobe; T Inamizu; M Yamakido Journal: Oncogene Date: 1995-03-02 Impact factor: 9.867
Authors: J R Jass; K A Do; L A Simms; H Iino; C Wynter; S P Pillay; J Searle; G Radford-Smith; J Young; B Leggett Journal: Gut Date: 1998-05 Impact factor: 23.059
Authors: Byung Joon Choi; Jung Hwan Yoon; Olga Kim; Won Suk Choi; Suk Woo Nam; Jung Young Lee; Won Sang Park Journal: World J Gastroenterol Date: 2015-08-21 Impact factor: 5.742