Literature DB >> 11819179

Antiretroviral drug resistance testing in patients with HIV-1 infection: a meta-analysis study.

Donato Torre1, Roberto Tambini.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: HIV-1 resistance tests, both phenotype and genotype, have been entering clinical practice during the last years, but limited prospective studies have been reported in antiretroviral-treated patients with virological failure.
PURPOSE: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) published or presented at the most important international conferences until February 2001 was performed to estimate the impact of resistance-guided antiretroviral therapy on virological outcome.
METHOD: A search for RCTs was performed by using a MEDLINE database, Internet sources, and international conference presentations and was updated September 2001. All RCTs available, including four RCTs on genotype resistance testing, one RCT on phenotype resistance testing, and one RCT on genotypic and phenotypic testing, were analyzed. The rate of patients with undetectable viremia at 3 months was reported in all RCTs and the rate at 6 months was reported in 4 of 6 RCTs.
RESULTS: The rate of patients with undetectable viral load after 3 months was 42.6% in patients who were treated based on genotype results and was 33.2% in patients who were treated based on standard of care (SOC; odds ratio [OR] 1.7; 95% CI: 1.3-2.2). At 6 months, undetectable viremia was observed in 38.8% and 28.7% of the patients, respectively (OR: 1.6; 95% CI: 1.2-2.2). In 142 patients, expert advice was provided to optimize clinical use of genotypic data. The higher rate of viral suppression was achieved in this subgroup of patients (50.7% vs. SOC 35.8%; OR 2.4; 95% CI 1.5-3.7). In contrast, undetectable viremia was achieved in 37.5% patients who were treated based on phenotype results versus 33.8% patients who were treated based on SOC (OR 1.1; 95% CI 0.8-1.6).
CONCLUSION: These results support the use of a genotypic test in patients experiencing virological failure during antiretroviral treatment. Expert interpretation of the test may increase the probability of virological response.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11819179     DOI: 10.1310/FY66-NVWJ-3332-HW3C

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  HIV Clin Trials        ISSN: 1528-4336


  6 in total

Review 1.  Economic models of antiretroviral therapy: searching for the optimal strategy.

Authors:  Fred J Hellinger
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2006       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Effective treatment of patients in a deep salvage situation with "non-active HAART": experiences with the expert advice system RADATA.

Authors:  T Lorenzen; I Walther; A Stoehr; B Salzberger; A Plettenberg
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2009-10-13       Impact factor: 3.553

3.  Efficacy of directly observed treatment of HIV infection: experience in AIDS welfare homes.

Authors:  I Tinoco; J A Girón-González; M T González-González; A Vergara de Campos; L Rodríguez-Félix; A Serrano; A Bascuñana
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  2004-03-13       Impact factor: 3.267

4.  Prevalence of HIV Drug Resistance Mutations in HIV Type 1 Isolates in Antiretroviral Therapy Naïve Population from Northern India.

Authors:  S Sinha; H Ahmad; R C Shekhar; N Kumar; L Dar; J C Samantaray; S K Sharma; A Bhargava; R M Pandey; R L Mitsuyasu; J L Fahey
Journal:  AIDS Res Treat       Date:  2012-03-15

5.  Cost-effectiveness of genotypic antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-infected patients with treatment failure.

Authors:  Pedram Sendi; Huldrych F Günthard; Mathew Simcock; Bruno Ledergerber; Jörg Schüpbach; Manuel Battegay
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2007-01-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Antiretroviral resistance testing in HIV-positive people.

Authors:  Theresa Aves; Joshua Tambe; Reed Ac Siemieniuk; Lawrence Mbuagbaw
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2018-11-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.