OBJECTIVES: To study the functional difference in the performances of sliding femoral head screws by comparing the displacement of the screw in relation to the femoral head in hips treated with the Gamma Asia-Pacific nail (GN) and hips treated with the intramedullary hip screw (IMHS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Displacement of the femoral head screw in relation to the femoral head was measured in fifty-six elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures who were treated with an IMHS or GN. Displacement of the femoral head screw was determined by comparing screw position in the immediate postoperative radiograph with a film taken 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the GN group, significant displacement of the screw was observed with 3.8 +/- 3.8 percent translation in the horizontal axis (P < 0.005) and 4.3 +/- 5.1 percent displacement in the vertical axis (P < 0.05) in comparison with the diameter of the femoral head. In comparison, displacement of the femoral head screw was not observed with the IMHS (P = 0.48 for horizontal, P = 0.18 for vertical). Total displacement of the femoral head screw in relation to the femoral head in the GN was twice that observed in the IMHS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the displacement of the femoral head screw of the IMHS was less than the lag screw of the GN. However, it is still unknown whether this smaller displacement of the IMHS is clinically significant for reducing the rate of screw cut-out after surgery.
OBJECTIVES: To study the functional difference in the performances of sliding femoral head screws by comparing the displacement of the screw in relation to the femoral head in hips treated with the Gamma Asia-Pacific nail (GN) and hips treated with the intramedullary hip screw (IMHS). STUDY DESIGN: Retrospective review of prospectively collected data. METHODS: Displacement of the femoral head screw in relation to the femoral head was measured in fifty-six elderly patients with intertrochanteric fractures who were treated with an IMHS or GN. Displacement of the femoral head screw was determined by comparing screw position in the immediate postoperative radiograph with a film taken 3 months after surgery. RESULTS: In the GN group, significant displacement of the screw was observed with 3.8 +/- 3.8 percent translation in the horizontal axis (P < 0.005) and 4.3 +/- 5.1 percent displacement in the vertical axis (P < 0.05) in comparison with the diameter of the femoral head. In comparison, displacement of the femoral head screw was not observed with the IMHS (P = 0.48 for horizontal, P = 0.18 for vertical). Total displacement of the femoral head screw in relation to the femoral head in the GN was twice that observed in the IMHS (P < 0.001). CONCLUSION: These results indicate that the displacement of the femoral head screw of the IMHS was less than the lag screw of the GN. However, it is still unknown whether this smaller displacement of the IMHS is clinically significant for reducing the rate of screw cut-out after surgery.
Authors: Laurent Audigé; Flurin Cagienard; Christoph Martin Sprecher; Norbert Suhm; Marc Andreas Müller Journal: Int Orthop Date: 2013-10-22 Impact factor: 3.075