BACKGROUND: Perioperative myocardial ischemia is conventionally monitored using five electrocardiographic leads, with only one precordial lead placed at V5. This is based on studies from more than a decade ago. The authors reassessed this convention by analyzing data obtained from continuous on-line 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring. METHODS: One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing vascular surgery were monitored by continuous 12-lead ST-trend analysis during and for 48-72 h after surgery. Cardiac troponin I was measured in the first 3 postoperative days, and cardiac outcome was prospectively recorded. Ischemia was defined as ST deviation, relative to the reference preanesthesia electrocardiogram, of 0.2 mV or more in one lead or 0.1 mV or more in two contiguous leads, lasting more than 10 min. RESULTS: During 11,132 patient-hours of monitoring, 38 patients (20.5%) had 66 transient ischemic events, with all but one denoted by ST-segment depression. Twelve patients (6.5%) sustained postoperative infarction (cardiac troponin I > 3.1 ng/ml). Among the 38 patients with ischemia, lead V3 most frequently (86.8%) demonstrated ischemia, followed by V4 (78.9%) and V5 (65.8%). Among the 12 patients with infarction, V4 was most sensitive to ischemia (83.3%), followed by V3 and V5 (75% each). Combining two precordial leads increased the sensitivity for detecting ischemia (97.4% for V3 + V5 and 92.1% for either V4 + V5 or V3 + V4) and infarction (100% for V4 + V5 or V3 + V5 and 83.3% for V3 + V4). On average, baseline preanesthesia ST was above isoelectric in V1 through V3 and below isoelectric in V5 through V6. Lead V4 was closest to the isoelectric level on the baseline electrocardiogram, rendering it most suitable for ischemia monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: As a single lead, V4 is more sensitive and appropriate than V5 for detecting prolonged postoperative ischemia and infarction. Two precordial leads or more are necessary so as to approach a sensitivity of greater than 95% for detection of perioperative ischemia and infarction.
BACKGROUND: Perioperative myocardial ischemia is conventionally monitored using five electrocardiographic leads, with only one precordial lead placed at V5. This is based on studies from more than a decade ago. The authors reassessed this convention by analyzing data obtained from continuous on-line 12-lead electrocardiographic monitoring. METHODS: One hundred eighty-five consecutive patients undergoing vascular surgery were monitored by continuous 12-lead ST-trend analysis during and for 48-72 h after surgery. Cardiac troponin I was measured in the first 3 postoperative days, and cardiac outcome was prospectively recorded. Ischemia was defined as ST deviation, relative to the reference preanesthesia electrocardiogram, of 0.2 mV or more in one lead or 0.1 mV or more in two contiguous leads, lasting more than 10 min. RESULTS: During 11,132 patient-hours of monitoring, 38 patients (20.5%) had 66 transient ischemic events, with all but one denoted by ST-segment depression. Twelve patients (6.5%) sustained postoperative infarction (cardiac troponin I > 3.1 ng/ml). Among the 38 patients with ischemia, lead V3 most frequently (86.8%) demonstrated ischemia, followed by V4 (78.9%) and V5 (65.8%). Among the 12 patients with infarction, V4 was most sensitive to ischemia (83.3%), followed by V3 and V5 (75% each). Combining two precordial leads increased the sensitivity for detecting ischemia (97.4% for V3 + V5 and 92.1% for either V4 + V5 or V3 + V4) and infarction (100% for V4 + V5 or V3 + V5 and 83.3% for V3 + V4). On average, baseline preanesthesia ST was above isoelectric in V1 through V3 and below isoelectric in V5 through V6. Lead V4 was closest to the isoelectric level on the baseline electrocardiogram, rendering it most suitable for ischemia monitoring. CONCLUSIONS: As a single lead, V4 is more sensitive and appropriate than V5 for detecting prolonged postoperative ischemia and infarction. Two precordial leads or more are necessary so as to approach a sensitivity of greater than 95% for detection of perioperative ischemia and infarction.
Authors: Peter Nagele; Frank Brown; Amber Francis; Mitchell G Scott; Brian F Gage; J Philip Miller Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2014-02 Impact factor: 7.892
Authors: Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Pai Ching Yu; Bruno Caramelli; André Coelho Marques; Daniela Calderaro; Luciana Savoy Fornari; Claudio Pinho; Alina Coutinho Rodrigues Feitosa; Carisi Anne Polanczyk; Carlos Eduardo Rochitte; Carlos Jardim; Carolina L Z Vieira; Debora Y M Nakamura; Denise Iezzi; Dirk Schreen; Eduardo Leal Adam; Elbio Antonio D'Amico; Emerson Q de Lima; Emmanuel de Almeida Burdmann; Enrique Indalecio Pachón Mateo; Fabiana Goulart Marcondes Braga; Fabio S Machado; Flavio J de Paula; Gabriel Assis Lopes do Carmo; Gilson Soares Feitosa-Filho; Gustavo Faibischew Prado; Heno Ferreira Lopes; João R C Fernandes; José J G de Lima; Luciana Sacilotto; Luciano Ferreira Drager; Luciano Janussi Vacanti; Luis Eduardo Paim Rohde; Luis F L Prada; Luis Henrique Wolff Gowdak; Marcelo Luiz Campos Vieira; Maristela Camargo Monachini; Milena Frota Macatrão-Costa; Milena Ribeiro Paixão; Mucio Tavares de Oliveira; Patricia Cury; Paula R Villaça; Pedro Silvio Farsky; Rinaldo F Siciliano; Roberto Henrique Heinisch; Rogerio Souza; Sandra F M Gualandro; Tarso Augusto Duenhas Accorsi; Wilson Mathias Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2017 Jan-Feb Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: André Arpad Faludi; Maria Cristina de Oliveira Izar; José Francisco Kerr Saraiva; Ana Paula Marte Chacra; Henrique Tria Bianco; Abrahão Afiune; Adriana Bertolami; Alexandre C Pereira; Ana Maria Lottenberg; Andrei C Sposito; Antonio Carlos Palandri Chagas; Antonio Casella; Antônio Felipe Simão; Aristóteles Comte de Alencar; Bruno Caramelli; Carlos Costa Magalhães; Carlos Eduardo Negrão; Carlos Eduardo Dos Santos Ferreira; Carlos Scherr; Claudine Maria Alves Feio; Cristiane Kovacs; Daniel Branco de Araújo; Daniel Magnoni; Daniela Calderaro; Danielle Menosi Gualandro; Edgard Pessoa de Mello; Elizabeth Regina Giunco Alexandre; Emília Inoue Sato; Emilio Hideyuki Moriguchi; Fabiana Hanna Rached; Fábio César Dos Santos; Fernando Henpin Yue Cesena; Francisco Antonio Helfenstein Fonseca; Henrique Andrade Rodrigues da Fonseca; Hermes Toros Xavier; Isabela Cardoso Pimentel Mota; Isabela de Carlos Back Giuliano; Jaqueline Scholz Issa; Jayme Diament; João Bosco Pesquero; José Ernesto Dos Santos; José Rocha Faria; José Xavier de Melo; Juliana Tieko Kato; Kerginaldo Paulo Torres; Marcelo Chiara Bertolami; Marcelo Heitor Vieira Assad; Márcio Hiroshi Miname; Marileia Scartezini; Neusa Assumpta Forti; Otávio Rizzi Coelho; Raul Cavalcante Maranhão; Raul Dias Dos Santos; Renato Jorge Alves; Roberta Lara Cassani; Roberto Tadeu Barcellos Betti; Tales de Carvalho; Tânia Leme da Rocha Martinez; Viviane Zorzanelli Rocha Giraldez; Wilson Salgado Journal: Arq Bras Cardiol Date: 2017-07 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Peter Nagele; Lesley K Rao; Mrudula Penta; Dorina Kallogjeri; Edward L Spitznagel; Laura F Cavallone; Brian Nussenbaum; Jay F Piccirillo Journal: Head Neck Date: 2010-09-30 Impact factor: 3.147
Authors: Mohammad A Helwani; Amit Amin; Paul Lavigne; Srikar Rao; Shari Oesterreich; Eslam Samaha; Jamie C Brown; Peter Nagele Journal: Anesthesiology Date: 2018-06 Impact factor: 7.892