Literature DB >> 11818714

Prostate-specific antigen in hemodialysis patients and the influence of dialysis in its levels.

Ioannis Tzanakis1, Savas Kazoulis, Nikolaos Girousis, Stella Kagia, Vlassis Spandidakis, Nektarios Karefillakis, Maria Georgila, Ionnis Cristoulakis, Petros Hatzilias, Nikolaos Kallivretakis.   

Abstract

The determination of prostate-specific antigen (PSA) is a useful tool in the diagnosis and follow-up of prostate cancer in males, but its diagnostic validity is uncertain in hemodialysis patients. We prospectively evaluated PSA in male hemodialysis patients as well as the influence of a single dialytic session on its levels. We measured pre- and postdialysis total PSA (tPSA) in 63 hemodialysis patients (mean age 68.44 +/- 11.16 years, range 33-86 years) who had received dialysis with low flux membranes as well as in 729 normal subjects (mean age 63.22 +/- 16.85 years, range 28-92 years). We also measured pre- and postdialysis hematocrit (Hct) in patients in order to estimate the degree of hemoconcentration after the dialysis session. If any of the examined patients or subjects had abnormal tPSA levels then free PSA (fPSA) and the f/tPSA ratio were additionally measured. Patients had lower levels of tPSA compared with those of the subjects (2.41 +/- 4.06 vs. 3.76 +/- 7.16 ng/ml, p < 0.05) while both of the two groups had near equal prevalence of individuals with abnormal values of tPSA or f/tPSA ratio (patients 12.69 and 7.93%, subjects 11.01 and 7.11%, respectively; nonsignificant. Dialysis resulted in a 9.48% increase in mean tPSA levels (2.41 +/- 4.06 vs. 2.69 +/- 4.06 ng/ml, nonsignificant) and in a 10.09% increase in mean Hct; the correlation between these increases was significant (r = 0.79, p < 0.001). In conclusion, our male hemodialysis patients had lower PSA levels compared with the general population, while both groups of individuals had a similar prevalence of abnormal values of tPSA and f/tPSA ratio. Dialysis with low flux membranes does not eliminate PSA and its postdialysis increase is due to hemoconcentration. Copyright 2002 S. Karger AG, Basel

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818714     DOI: 10.1159/000049051

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Nephron        ISSN: 1660-8151            Impact factor:   2.847


  5 in total

1.  Prostate Cancer Screening and Management in Solid Organ Transplant Candidates and Recipients.

Authors:  Ezequiel Becher; Alex Wang; Herbert Lepor
Journal:  Rev Urol       Date:  2019

Review 2.  [Diagnostics and treatment of prostate cancer after kidney transplantation].

Authors:  A Wicht; A Hamza; H Loertzer; M Dietl; H Heynemann; P Fornara
Journal:  Urologe A       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 0.639

3.  Prostate cancer screening: Canadian guidelines 2011.

Authors:  Jonathan I Izawa; Laurence Klotz; D Robert Siemens; Wassim Kassouf; Alan So; John Jordan; Michael Chetner; Alla E Iansavichene
Journal:  Can Urol Assoc J       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 1.862

4.  Screening for prostate cancer using prostate-specific antigen testing in Japanese men on hemodialysis.

Authors:  Toshifumi Kurahashi; Hideaki Miyake; Masashi Shinozaki; Nobutoshi Oka; Atsushi Takenaka; Isao Hara; Yosuke Matsumura; Masato Fujisawa
Journal:  Int Urol Nephrol       Date:  2008       Impact factor: 2.370

Review 5.  Tumour markers and kidney function: a systematic review.

Authors:  Giuseppe Coppolino; Davide Bolignano; Laura Rivoli; Giuseppe Mazza; Piera Presta; Giorgio Fuiano
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-02-06       Impact factor: 3.411

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.