Literature DB >> 11818598

Helical CT with CT angiography in assessing periampullary neoplasms: identification of vascular invasion.

Luigi Lepanto1, Yervant Arzoumanian, David Gianfelice, Pierre Perreault, Michel Dagenais, Réal Lapointe, Richard Létourneau, André Roy.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To determine the accuracy of helical computed tomography (CT) with CT angiography in identifying vascular invasion by periampullary neoplasms and to assess the added value of CT angiography.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: Sixty-nine patients suspected of having periampullary neoplasms were examined. Images from dual phase helical CT with CT angiography were compared with surgical findings in 36 patients. Arterial and venous invasion were assessed separately. Accuracy, positive predictive value (PPV), and negative predictive value (NPV) were determined for CT alone and for CT supplemented with CT angiography.
RESULTS: The accuracy, PPV, and NPV of helical CT with CT angiography in identifying venous invasion was 92% (33 of 36 patients), 86% (12 of 14 patients), and 95% (21 of 22 patients), respectively. When transverse CT images alone were analyzed, accuracy decreased to 69% (25 of 36 patients) (P =.005); PPV and NPV were 63% (five of eight patients) and 71% (20 of 28 patients), respectively. When identifying arterial invasion, the accuracy of CT with CT angiography and of CT alone was 86% (31 of 36 patients). PPV and NPV also were identical at 71% (five of seven patients) and 90% (26 of 29 patients), respectively.
CONCLUSION: CT angiography significantly increases the ability to identify venous invasion when compared with CT alone but does not improve detection of arterial invasion.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11818598     DOI: 10.1148/radiol.2222010203

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Radiology        ISSN: 0033-8419            Impact factor:   11.105


  12 in total

1.  Vascular involvement in pancreatic neoplasm: a comparison between spiral CT and DSA.

Authors:  Ettore Squillaci; Ezio Fanucci; Francesco Sciuto; Salvatore Masala; Giulio Sodani; Marco Carlani; Giovanni Simonetti
Journal:  Dig Dis Sci       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 3.199

2.  Computed tomography-based diagnostics might be insufficient in the determination of pancreatic cancer unresectability.

Authors:  Vyacheslav I Egorov; Roman V Petrov; Elena N Solodinina; Gregory G Karmazanovsky; Natalia S Starostina; Natalia A Kuruschkina
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2013-04-27

Review 3.  Diagnostic accuracy of EUS and CT of vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: a systematic review.

Authors:  RenBao Yang; ManPeng Lu; XiaoXing Qian; Jiong Chen; Liang Li; JiaWen Wang; YouQian Zhang
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2014-06-11       Impact factor: 4.553

Review 4.  Vascular invasion in pancreatic cancer: Imaging modalities, preoperative diagnosis and surgical management.

Authors:  Nicolas C Buchs; Michael Chilcott; Pierre-Alexandre Poletti; Leo H Buhler; Philippe Morel
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2010-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

5.  Pancreatic adenocarcinoma: Outstanding problems.

Authors:  Olga P Zakharova; Grigory G Karmazanovsky; Viacheslav I Egorov
Journal:  World J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2012-05-27

Review 6.  Staging cancer of the pancreas.

Authors:  G Morana; L Cancian; R Pozzi Mucelli; C Cugini
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

7.  The presence of a cytopathologist increases the diagnostic accuracy of endoscopic ultrasound-guided fine needle aspiration cytology for pancreatic adenocarcinoma: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  S Hébert-Magee; S Bae; S Varadarajulu; J Ramesh; A R Frost; M A Eloubeidi; I A Eltoum
Journal:  Cytopathology       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.073

Review 8.  Imaging diagnosis of pancreatic cancer: a state-of-the-art review.

Authors:  Eun Sun Lee; Jeong Min Lee
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2014-06-28       Impact factor: 5.742

9.  The exploration of quantitative intra-tumoral metabolic heterogeneity in dual-time 18F-FDG PET/CT of pancreatic cancer.

Authors:  Guorong Jia; Jian Zhang; Rou Li; Jianhua Yan; Changjing Zuo
Journal:  Abdom Radiol (NY)       Date:  2021-04-18

10.  Arterial vs pancreatic phase: which is the best choice in the evaluation of pancreatic endocrine tumours with multidetector computed tomography (MDCT)?

Authors:  S Gusmini; R Nicoletti; C Martinenghi; C Caborni; G Balzano; A Zerbi; S I Rocchetti; P G Arcidiacono; L Albarello; F De Cobelli; V Di Carlo; A Del Maschio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2007-10-21       Impact factor: 6.313

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.