Literature DB >> 11817991

Antihypertensive treatment with and without benazepril in patients with chronic renal insufficiency: a US economic evaluation.

Thomas J Hogan1, William J Elliott, Arnold H Seto, George L Bakris.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To conduct an economic analysis in the US of antihypertensive treatment with and without benazepril in patients with chronic renal insufficiency.
DESIGN: A four-state Markov model, using clinical data obtained from a 3-year randomised clinical trial [the Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition in Progressive Renal Insufficiency (AIPRI) study] plus its extension study (median 3.6 years), and cost data obtained from published US sources. The period of analysis was 7 years following randomisation. PERSPECTIVE: Healthcare payer.
SETTING: Clinical data were obtained from multiple medical centres in three European countries as described in the published studies. Key economic data were obtained from the US Healthcare Financing Administration's End Stage Renal Disease programme. PATIENTS AND
INTERVENTIONS: In the clinical studies on which this economic analysis was based, patients with chronic renal insufficiency of various aetiologies were randomised to antihypertensive therapy with or without concomitant benazepril. MAIN OUTCOME MEASURES AND
RESULTS: Over 7 years of analysis, patients randomised to antihypertensive treatment with concomitant benazepril therapy incurred on average USD12991 (1999 values) lower medical costs than patients prescribed antihypertensive treatment without benazepril, and obtained an additional 0.091 quality-adjusted life years (QALYs). Costs and QALYs were greater for the benazepril arm than the placebo arm for all years of analysis after the first. Rank order stability of results favouring the benazepril therapy arm was found in sensitivity analyses of changes in key model parameters. Additional economic and health benefits favouring patients receiving benazepril would be seen if underlying model rates of dialysis and transplantation were increased, as may be appropriate to reflect treatment practice differences in the US relative to European countries.
CONCLUSIONS: Benazepril therapy as a component of antihypertensive treatment of persons with chronic renal insufficiency initially costs money, but investment costs are recouped quickly and return on investment continues to grow. The impact of end-stage renal disease on patient health and healthcare costs is great. Thus, the quality-adjusted survival benefits and overall cost savings seen in benazepril recipients over a prolonged period (2 to 7 years) indicate that the strategy of prescribing benazepril to reduce progression of renal disease in patients with renal insufficiency is both clinically and economically beneficial compared with current antihypertensive regimens without ACE inhibition.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11817991     DOI: 10.2165/00019053-200220010-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics        ISSN: 1170-7690            Impact factor:   4.981


  23 in total

1.  XII. International comparisons of ESRD therapy.

Authors: 
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  1999-08       Impact factor: 8.860

2.  Effect of angiotensin-converting enzyme inhibitors on the progression of nondiabetic renal disease: a meta-analysis of randomized trials. Angiotensin-Converting-Enzyme Inhibition and Progressive Renal Disease Study Group.

Authors:  I Giatras; J Lau; A S Levey
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  1997-09-01       Impact factor: 25.391

3.  Modelling and costing the consequences of using an ACE inhibitor to slow the progression of renal failure in type I diabetic patients.

Authors:  B M Hendry; G C Viberti; S Hummel; A Bagust; J Piercy
Journal:  QJM       Date:  1997-04

4.  Transplantation versus dialysis: a study of quality of life.

Authors:  P L Morris; B Jones
Journal:  Transplant Proc       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 1.066

5.  Randomised placebo-controlled trial of effect of ramipril on decline in glomerular filtration rate and risk of terminal renal failure in proteinuric, non-diabetic nephropathy. The GISEN Group (Gruppo Italiano di Studi Epidemiologici in Nefrologia)

Authors: 
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  1997-06-28       Impact factor: 79.321

6.  Markov models in medical decision making: a practical guide.

Authors:  F A Sonnenberg; J R Beck
Journal:  Med Decis Making       Date:  1993 Oct-Dec       Impact factor: 2.583

Review 7.  Preserving renal function in adults with hypertension and diabetes: a consensus approach. National Kidney Foundation Hypertension and Diabetes Executive Committees Working Group.

Authors:  G L Bakris; M Williams; L Dworkin; W J Elliott; M Epstein; R Toto; K Tuttle; J Douglas; W Hsueh; J Sowers
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 8.860

8.  Economic evaluation of benazepril in chronic renal insufficiency.

Authors:  B A van Hout; G P Simeon; J McDonnell; J F Mann
Journal:  Kidney Int Suppl       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 10.545

9.  Measurement of quality of life in end-stage renal disease: the time trade-off approach.

Authors:  D N Churchill; G W Torrance; D W Taylor; C C Barnes; D Ludwin; A Shimizu; E K Smith
Journal:  Clin Invest Med       Date:  1987-01       Impact factor: 0.825

10.  Quality of life after kidney transplantation. A prospective, randomized comparison of cyclosporine and conventional immunosuppressive therapy.

Authors:  R G Simmons; L Abress; C R Anderson
Journal:  Transplantation       Date:  1988-02       Impact factor: 4.939

View more
  10 in total

Review 1.  A review of the costs and cost effectiveness of interventions in chronic kidney disease: implications for policy.

Authors:  Joseph Menzin; Lisa M Lines; Daniel E Weiner; Peter J Neumann; Christine Nichols; Lauren Rodriguez; Irene Agodoa; Tracy Mayne
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 4.981

2.  Management of Active Surveillance-Eligible Prostate Cancer during Pretransplantation Workup of Patients with Kidney Failure: A Simulation Study.

Authors:  Uwe Bieri; Kerstin Hübel; Harald Seeger; Girish S Kulkarni; Tullio Sulser; Thomas Hermanns; Marian S Wettstein
Journal:  Clin J Am Soc Nephrol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 8.237

3.  Cost Effectiveness of Paricalcitol versus a non-selective vitamin D receptor activator for secondary hyperparathyroidism in the UK: a chronic kidney disease markov model.

Authors:  Mark Nuijten; Dennis L Andress; Steven E Marx; Alistair S Curry; Raimund Sterz
Journal:  Clin Drug Investig       Date:  2010       Impact factor: 2.859

Review 4.  Reducing the costs of chronic kidney disease while delivering quality health care: a call to action.

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Lieven Annemans; Edwina Brown; Ron Gansevoort; Judith J Gout-Zwart; Norbert Lameire; Rachael L Morton; Rainer Oberbauer; Maarten J Postma; Marcello Tonelli; Wim Van Biesen; Carmine Zoccali
Journal:  Nat Rev Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-30       Impact factor: 28.314

5.  A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Adherence Promotion Strategies to Improve Rejection Rates in Adolescent Kidney Transplant Recipients.

Authors:  Charles D Varnell; Kristin L Rich; Avani C Modi; David K Hooper; Mark H Eckman
Journal:  Am J Kidney Dis       Date:  2022-02-25       Impact factor: 11.072

Review 6.  Deleting Death and Dialysis: Conservative Care of Cardio-Vascular Risk and Kidney Function Loss in Chronic Kidney Disease (CKD).

Authors:  Raymond Vanholder; Steven Van Laecke; Griet Glorieux; Francis Verbeke; Esmeralda Castillo-Rodriguez; Alberto Ortiz
Journal:  Toxins (Basel)       Date:  2018-06-12       Impact factor: 4.546

Review 7.  Interventions for preventing the progression of autosomal dominant polycystic kidney disease.

Authors:  Davide Bolignano; Suetonia C Palmer; Marinella Ruospo; Carmine Zoccali; Jonathan C Craig; Giovanni F M Strippoli
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2015-07-14

8.  Population level outcomes and cost-effectiveness of hepatitis C treatment pre- vs postkidney transplantation.

Authors:  Brittany A Shelton; Deirdre Sawinski; Benjamin P Linas; Peter P Reese; Margaux Mustian; Mitch Hungerpiller; Rhiannon D Reed; Paul A MacLennan; Jayme E Locke
Journal:  Am J Transplant       Date:  2018-08-30       Impact factor: 9.369

9.  Workplace Outreach Program Improves Management of Chronic Kidney Disease.

Authors:  Olga A Iakoubova; Carmen H Tong; Charles M Rowland; Andre R Arellano; Lance A Bare; Maren S Fragala; Charles E Birse
Journal:  J Occup Environ Med       Date:  2021-12-30       Impact factor: 2.306

10.  Evaluating the Cost-Effectiveness of Celecoxib versus Ibuprofen and Naproxen in Patients with Osteoarthritis in United Arab Emirates Based on the PRECISION Trial.

Authors:  Viktor V Chirikov; Chris Walker; Jennifer M Stephens; Patricia Schepman; Richard Chambers; Mahmoud Bakir; Gregory W Poorman; Seema Haider; Mohammed Farghaly
Journal:  Clinicoecon Outcomes Res       Date:  2021-05-19
  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.