Literature DB >> 11817740

The Gaussian derivative model for spatial-temporal vision: I. Cortical model.

R A Young1, R M Lesperance, W W Meyer.   

Abstract

How do we see the motion of objects as well as their shapes? The Gaussian Derivative (GD) spatial model is extended to time to help answer this question. The GD spatio-temporal model requires only two numbers to describe the complete three-dimensional space-time shapes of individual receptive fields in primate visual cortex. These two numbers are the derivative numbers along the respective spatial and temporal principal axes of a given receptive field. Nine transformation parameters allow for a standard geometric association of these intrinsic axes with the extrinsic environment. The GD spatio-temporal model describes in one framework the following properties of primate simple cell fields: motion properties, number of lobes in space-time, spatial orientation. location, and size. A discrete difference-of-offset-Gaussians (DOOG) model provides a plausible physiological mechanism to form GD-like model fields in both space and time. The GD model hypothesizes that receptive fields at the first stage of processing in the visual cortex approximate 'derivative analyzers' that estimate local spatial and temporal derivatives of the intensity profile in the visual environment. The receptive fields as modeled provide operators that can allow later stages of processing in either a biological or machine vision system to estimate the motion as well as the shapes of objects in the environment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11817740     DOI: 10.1163/156856801753253582

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spat Vis        ISSN: 0169-1015


  11 in total

1.  Engineering-approach accelerates computational understanding of V1-V2 neural properties.

Authors:  Shunji Satoh; Shiro Usui
Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn       Date:  2008-09-26       Impact factor: 5.082

2.  Idealized computational models for auditory receptive fields.

Authors:  Tony Lindeberg; Anders Friberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-03-30       Impact factor: 3.240

3.  When machine vision meets histology: A comparative evaluation of model architecture for classification of histology sections.

Authors:  Cheng Zhong; Ju Han; Alexander Borowsky; Bahram Parvin; Yunfu Wang; Hang Chang
Journal:  Med Image Anal       Date:  2016-09-09       Impact factor: 8.545

4.  Classification of Tumor Histology via Morphometric Context.

Authors:  Hang Chang; Alexander Borowsky; Paul Spellman; Bahram Parvin
Journal:  Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit       Date:  2013-06-23

5.  Stacked Predictive Sparse Decomposition for Classification of Histology Sections.

Authors:  Hang Chang; Yin Zhou; Alexander Borowsky; Kenneth Barner; Paul Spellman; Bahram Parvin
Journal:  Int J Comput Vis       Date:  2014-12-23       Impact factor: 7.410

6.  Stacked Predictive Sparse Coding for Classification of Distinct Regions of Tumor Histopathology.

Authors:  Hang Chang; Yin Zhou; Paul Spellman; Bahram Parvin
Journal:  Proc IEEE Int Conf Comput Vis       Date:  2013

7.  Relating information, encoding and adaptation: decoding the population firing rate in visual areas 17/18 in response to a stimulus transition.

Authors:  David Eriksson; Sonata Valentiniene; Stylianos Papaioannou
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-04-27       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Automation of Hessian-Based Tubularity Measure Response Function in 3D Biomedical Images.

Authors:  Oleksandr P Dzyubak; Erik L Ritman
Journal:  Int J Biomed Imaging       Date:  2011-02-22

9.  A computational theory of visual receptive fields.

Authors:  Tony Lindeberg
Journal:  Biol Cybern       Date:  2013-11-07       Impact factor: 2.086

Review 10.  Invariance of visual operations at the level of receptive fields.

Authors:  Tony Lindeberg
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-07-19       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.