Literature DB >> 11817469

Effect of prophylactic polishing protocols on the surface roughness of esthetic restorative materials.

A L Neme1, K B Frazier, L B Roeder, T L Debner.   

Abstract

Many polishing protocols have been evaluated in vitro for their effect on the surface roughness of restorative materials. These results have been useful in establishing protocols for in vivo application. However, limited research has focused on the subsequent care and maintenance of esthetic restorations following their placement. This investigation evaluated the effect of five polishing protocols that could be implemented at recall on the surface roughness of five direct esthetic restorative materials. Specimens (n=25) measuring 8 mm diameter x 3 mm thick were fabricated in an acrylic mold using five light-cured resin-based materials (hybrid composite, microfilled composite, packable composite, compomer and resin-modified glass ionomer). After photopolymerization, all specimens were polished with Sof-Lex Disks to produce an initial (baseline) surface finish. All specimens were then polished with one of five prophylactic protocols (Butler medium paste, Butler coarse paste, OneGloss, SuperBuff or OneGloss & SuperBuff). The average surface roughness of each treated specimen was determined from three measurements with a profilometer (Surface 1). Next, all specimens were brushed 60,000 times at 1.5 Hz using a brush-head force of 2 N on a Manly V-8 cross-brushing machine in a 50:50 (w/w) slurry of toothpaste and water. The surface roughness of each specimen was measured after brushing (Surface 2) followed by re-polishing with one of five protocols, then final surface roughness values were determined (Surface 3). The data were analyzed using repeated measures ANOVA. Significant differences (p=0.05) in surface roughness were observed among restorative materials and polishing protocols. The microfilled and hybrid resin composite yielded significantly rougher surfaces than the other three materials following tooth brushing. Prophylactic polishing protocols can be used to restore a smooth surface on resin-based esthetic restorative materials following simulated tooth brushing.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11817469

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oper Dent        ISSN: 0361-7734            Impact factor:   2.440


  11 in total

Review 1.  Review: finishing and polishing procedures of (resin-modified) glass ionomers and compomers in paediatric dentistry.

Authors:  N S Koupis; L A M Marks; R M H Verbeeck; L C Martens
Journal:  Eur Arch Paediatr Dent       Date:  2007-03

2.  Influence of microleakage, surface roughness and biofilm control on secondary caries formation around composite resin restorations: an in situ evaluation.

Authors:  Fábio Garcia Lima; Ana Regina Romano; Marcos Britto Correa; Flávio Fernando Demarco
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

3.  Effect of finishing and polishing systems on the surface roughness and color change of composite resins.

Authors:  Numan Aydın; Fulya-Toksoy Topçu; Serpil Karaoğlanoğlu; Elif-Aybala Oktay; Uğur Erdemir
Journal:  J Clin Exp Dent       Date:  2021-05-01

4.  Profilometric analysis of two composite resins' surface repolished after tooth brush abrasion with three polishing systems.

Authors:  Mudit Uppal; Arathi Ganesh; Suresh Balagopal; Gurleen Kaur
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-07

5.  Influence of a prophylaxis paste on surface roughness of different composites, porcelain, enamel and dentin surfaces.

Authors:  Haktan Yurdaguven; Arzu Aykor; Emre Ozel; Hilmi Sabuncu; Mubin Soyman
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2012-01

6.  Effect of chemical degradation followed by toothbrushing on the surface roughness of restorative composites.

Authors:  Fernanda Regina Voltarelli; Claudia Batitucci dos Santos-Daroz; Marcelo Corrêa Alves; Andrea Nóbrega Cavalcanti; Giselle Maria Marchi
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 2.698

Review 7.  A Comparative Analysis of Different Finishing and Polishing Devices on Nanofilled, Microfilled, and Hybrid Composite: A Scanning Electron Microscopy and Profilometric Study.

Authors:  Rishi D Yadav; Deepak Raisingani; Divya Jindal; Rachit Mathur
Journal:  Int J Clin Pediatr Dent       Date:  2016-09-27

8.  The effect of prophylactic polishing pastes on surface roughness of indirect restorative materials.

Authors:  Esra Can Say; Haktan Yurdagüven; Özlem Malkondu; Nimet Ünlü; Mübin Soyman; Ender Kazazoğlu
Journal:  ScientificWorldJournal       Date:  2014-03-03

9.  In vitro evaluation of the effect of two finishing and polishing systems on four esthetic restorative materials.

Authors:  Rochna Rai; Ruchi Gupta
Journal:  J Conserv Dent       Date:  2013-11

10.  Effect of different polishing systems on the surface roughness of microhybrid composites.

Authors:  Kristine Guará Brusaca Almeida Scheibe; Karoline Guará Brusaca Almeida; Igor Studart Medeiros; José Ferreira Costa; Cláudia Maria Coêlho Alves
Journal:  J Appl Oral Sci       Date:  2009 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 2.698

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.