Literature DB >> 11816688

No Toyotas in health care: why medical care has not evolved to meet patients' needs.

M J Coye1.   

Abstract

The incentives and structure of health care in the United States produce exactly what we should expect in the quality of care for chronic disease: highly variable patterns of care and widespread failure to implement evidence-based best practices. The persistent inability of providers to improve patterns of practice is due in part to the lack of a "business case for quality." Providers cannot anticipate that quality improvements will result in higher prices, increased volume, or decreased costs. However, signs of a business case for quality are emerging, fueled by cost pressures, the increased availability of data, informed consumers, and public- and private-sector purchaser initiatives.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11816688     DOI: 10.1377/hlthaff.20.6.44

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Health Aff (Millwood)        ISSN: 0278-2715            Impact factor:   6.301


  7 in total

1.  Improving care for the treatment of alcohol and drug disorders.

Authors:  Dennis McCarty; David Gustafson; Victor A Capoccia; Frances Cotter
Journal:  J Behav Health Serv Res       Date:  2008-02-08       Impact factor: 1.505

2.  Guiding principles for the care of older adults with multimorbidity: an approach for clinicians: American Geriatrics Society Expert Panel on the Care of Older Adults with Multimorbidity.

Authors: 
Journal:  J Am Geriatr Soc       Date:  2012-09-19       Impact factor: 5.562

3.  Innovation Implementation in the Context of Hospital QI: Lessons Learned and Strategies for Success.

Authors:  Pavani Rangachari
Journal:  Innov Entrep Health       Date:  2018-02-21

4.  The cost consequences of improving diabetes care: the community health center experience.

Authors:  Elbert S Huang; Sydney E S Brown; James X Zhang; Anne C Kirchhoff; Cynthia T Schaefer; Lawrence P Casalino; Marshall H Chin
Journal:  Jt Comm J Qual Patient Saf       Date:  2008-03

5.  Disparate Impacts of Two Public Reporting Initiatives on Clinical and Perceived Quality in Healthcare.

Authors:  Ahreum Han; Jongsun Park
Journal:  Risk Manag Healthc Policy       Date:  2021-12-15

6.  Profiling quality of care: Is there a role for peer review?

Authors:  Timothy P Hofer; Steven M Asch; Rodney A Hayward; Lisa V Rubenstein; Mary M Hogan; John Adams; Eve A Kerr
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2004-05-19       Impact factor: 2.655

7.  Implementing change in primary care practices using electronic medical records: a conceptual framework.

Authors:  Lynne S Nemeth; Chris Feifer; Gail W Stuart; Steven M Ornstein
Journal:  Implement Sci       Date:  2008-01-16       Impact factor: 7.327

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.