Literature DB >> 11814505

The efficacy of telecolposcopy compared with traditional colposcopy.

Daron G Ferris1, Michael S Macfee, Jill A Miller, Mark S Litaker, Debra Crawley, Diane Watson.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Rural women have increased rates of cervical neoplasia, but colposcopic services are limited in rural clinics. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy of telecolposcopy for women in rural health care sites.
METHODS: Women with an indication for colposcopy were examined by local colposcopists at one of two rural clinics. Images of the colposcopic examination were transmitted to a tertiary care center for interpretation by an expert colposcopist. Another colposcopist (site expert) in attendance at the rural site also examined the same subjects, but did not share findings with the other colposcopists. Colposcopists independently determined the adequacy of the examination, colposcopic impression, biopsy intent and site, and management. Agreement between colposcopic impressions and cervical histology were assessed by using percent agreement, Cohen's kappa statistic, and McNemar's test with Bonferroni's adjustment.
RESULTS: Teleconsultation was required for 36.2% of colposcopic examinations. A significantly lower percentage of satisfactory colposcopic examinations was noted by the distant colposcopists (60.0%) compared with the other colposcopists (P <.001). Colposcopic impression agreement with histology varied minimally, 59.7% (kappa = 0.31) for local colposcopists, 52.7% (kappa = 0.22) for site experts, 55.7% (kappa = 0.27) for distant experts who concurrently viewed the examination, and 49.7% (kappa = 0.16) for distant experts who viewed the examination on videotape at a later time.
CONCLUSION: Teleconsultation was used for a substantial number of examinations. Diagnostic accuracy was maintained, but determination of colposcopic examination adequacy may be impaired by telecolposcopy. Telecolposcopy may help reduce barriers to medical access for women in rural areas.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11814505     DOI: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01671-4

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  6 in total

1.  Use of mobile telemedicine for cervical cancer screening.

Authors:  Kelly E Quinley; Rachel H Gormley; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Ting Shih; Zsofia Szep; Ann Steiner; Doreen Ramogola-Masire; Carrie L Kovarik
Journal:  J Telemed Telecare       Date:  2011-05-06       Impact factor: 6.184

2.  The European Society of Gynaecological Oncology (ESGO), the International Society for the Study of Vulvovaginal Disease (ISSVD), the European College for the Study of Vulval Disease (ECSVD) and the European Federation for Colposcopy (EFC) Consensus Statements on Pre-invasive Vulvar Lesions.

Authors:  Mario Preti; Elmar Joura; Pedro Vieira-Baptista; Marc Van Beurden; Federica Bevilacqua; Maaike C G Bleeker; Jacob Bornstein; Xavier Carcopino; Cyrus Chargari; Margaret E Cruickshank; Bilal Emre Erzeneoglu; Niccolò Gallio; Debra Heller; Vesna Kesic; Olaf Reich; Colleen K Stockdale; Bilal Esat Temiz; Linn Woelber; François Planchamp; Jana Zodzika; Denis Querleu; Murat Gultekin
Journal:  J Low Genit Tract Dis       Date:  2022-06-21       Impact factor: 3.842

3.  Telemedical cervical cancer screening to bridge medicaid service care gap for rural women.

Authors:  Wilbur C Hitt; Gordon Low; Tommy Mac Bird; Rachel Ott
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2013-05       Impact factor: 3.536

4.  Three principles for determining the relevancy of store-and-forward and live interactive telemedicine: reinterpreting two telemedicine research reviews and other research.

Authors:  Craig Locatis; Michael Ackerman
Journal:  Telemed J E Health       Date:  2012-11-27       Impact factor: 3.536

Review 5.  Use of Smartphones for the Detection of Uterine Cervical Cancer: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Denisse Champin; Max Carlos Ramírez-Soto; Javier Vargas-Herrera
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2021-12-01       Impact factor: 6.639

6.  Smartphone Use for Cervical Cancer Screening in Low-Resource Countries: A Pilot Study Conducted in Madagascar.

Authors:  Rosa Catarino; Pierre Vassilakos; Stefano Scaringella; Manuela Undurraga-Malinverno; Ulrike Meyer-Hamme; Dominique Ricard-Gauthier; Juan Carlos Matute; Patrick Petignat
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-07-29       Impact factor: 3.240

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.