OBJECTIVE: Rural women have increased rates of cervical neoplasia, but colposcopic services are limited in rural clinics. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy of telecolposcopy for women in rural health care sites. METHODS: Women with an indication for colposcopy were examined by local colposcopists at one of two rural clinics. Images of the colposcopic examination were transmitted to a tertiary care center for interpretation by an expert colposcopist. Another colposcopist (site expert) in attendance at the rural site also examined the same subjects, but did not share findings with the other colposcopists. Colposcopists independently determined the adequacy of the examination, colposcopic impression, biopsy intent and site, and management. Agreement between colposcopic impressions and cervical histology were assessed by using percent agreement, Cohen's kappa statistic, and McNemar's test with Bonferroni's adjustment. RESULTS: Teleconsultation was required for 36.2% of colposcopic examinations. A significantly lower percentage of satisfactory colposcopic examinations was noted by the distant colposcopists (60.0%) compared with the other colposcopists (P <.001). Colposcopic impression agreement with histology varied minimally, 59.7% (kappa = 0.31) for local colposcopists, 52.7% (kappa = 0.22) for site experts, 55.7% (kappa = 0.27) for distant experts who concurrently viewed the examination, and 49.7% (kappa = 0.16) for distant experts who viewed the examination on videotape at a later time. CONCLUSION: Teleconsultation was used for a substantial number of examinations. Diagnostic accuracy was maintained, but determination of colposcopic examination adequacy may be impaired by telecolposcopy. Telecolposcopy may help reduce barriers to medical access for women in rural areas.
OBJECTIVE: Rural women have increased rates of cervical neoplasia, but colposcopic services are limited in rural clinics. The purpose of this study was to estimate the efficacy of telecolposcopy for women in rural health care sites. METHODS:Women with an indication for colposcopy were examined by local colposcopists at one of two rural clinics. Images of the colposcopic examination were transmitted to a tertiary care center for interpretation by an expert colposcopist. Another colposcopist (site expert) in attendance at the rural site also examined the same subjects, but did not share findings with the other colposcopists. Colposcopists independently determined the adequacy of the examination, colposcopic impression, biopsy intent and site, and management. Agreement between colposcopic impressions and cervical histology were assessed by using percent agreement, Cohen's kappa statistic, and McNemar's test with Bonferroni's adjustment. RESULTS: Teleconsultation was required for 36.2% of colposcopic examinations. A significantly lower percentage of satisfactory colposcopic examinations was noted by the distant colposcopists (60.0%) compared with the other colposcopists (P <.001). Colposcopic impression agreement with histology varied minimally, 59.7% (kappa = 0.31) for local colposcopists, 52.7% (kappa = 0.22) for site experts, 55.7% (kappa = 0.27) for distant experts who concurrently viewed the examination, and 49.7% (kappa = 0.16) for distant experts who viewed the examination on videotape at a later time. CONCLUSION: Teleconsultation was used for a substantial number of examinations. Diagnostic accuracy was maintained, but determination of colposcopic examination adequacy may be impaired by telecolposcopy. Telecolposcopy may help reduce barriers to medical access for women in rural areas.
Authors: Kelly E Quinley; Rachel H Gormley; Sarah J Ratcliffe; Ting Shih; Zsofia Szep; Ann Steiner; Doreen Ramogola-Masire; Carrie L Kovarik Journal: J Telemed Telecare Date: 2011-05-06 Impact factor: 6.184
Authors: Mario Preti; Elmar Joura; Pedro Vieira-Baptista; Marc Van Beurden; Federica Bevilacqua; Maaike C G Bleeker; Jacob Bornstein; Xavier Carcopino; Cyrus Chargari; Margaret E Cruickshank; Bilal Emre Erzeneoglu; Niccolò Gallio; Debra Heller; Vesna Kesic; Olaf Reich; Colleen K Stockdale; Bilal Esat Temiz; Linn Woelber; François Planchamp; Jana Zodzika; Denis Querleu; Murat Gultekin Journal: J Low Genit Tract Dis Date: 2022-06-21 Impact factor: 3.842
Authors: Rosa Catarino; Pierre Vassilakos; Stefano Scaringella; Manuela Undurraga-Malinverno; Ulrike Meyer-Hamme; Dominique Ricard-Gauthier; Juan Carlos Matute; Patrick Petignat Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-07-29 Impact factor: 3.240