Literature DB >> 11814131

Laparoscopic common bile duct exploration.

A M Paganini1, F Feliciotti, M Guerrieri, A Tamburini, A De Sanctis, R Campagnacci, E Lezoche.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Laparoscopic common bile duct (CBD) exploration is gaining favor in the treatment of patients with gallstones and CBD stones. Our aim is to report our results with this procedure, focusing on the technical aspects. PATIENTS AND METHODS: All patients with proven CBD stones undergo laparoscopic transcystic CBD exploration, preferably, or a choledochotomy if the former is not feasible. According to CBD stone load and diameter, a biliary drainage tube is positioned for postoperative biliary decompression.
RESULTS: Among 284 patients who underwent laparoscopic CBD exploration, 4 (1.4%) were converted to open surgery. Transcystic CBD exploration was feasible in 163 cases (58.2%), but a choledochotomy was required in 117 (41.8%). Biliary drains were positioned in 204 patients (72.8%). Minor complications included hyperamylasemia (11; 3.9%) and minor subhepatic bile collection (7; 2.5%). Major complications were bile leakage (5; 1.8%), hemoperitoneum from cystic artery bleeding (2; 0.7%), subhepatic abscess (2; 0.7%), acute pancreatitis (1; 0.3%), and jejunal perforation (1; 0.3%). Retained CBD stones in 15 patients (5.3%) were removed through the biliary drainage sinus tract (8) or after endoscopy and sphincterotomy (6). In one patient, a small stone passed spontaneously (overall success rate 94.6%). Death from a cardiovascular complication was observed in one elderly high-risk patient (0.3%). Recurrent ductal stones in 5 patients (1.8%) were treated with ERCP and endoscopic sphincterotomy. One patient with re-recurrent ductal stones underwent hepaticojejunostomy.
CONCLUSIONS: Laparoscopic CBD exploration during LC in unselected patients solves two problems during the same anesthesia with high success rates (94.6%), low minor (6.4%) and major (3.8%) morbidity rates, and a low mortality rate (0.3%). Standardization of the technique is mandatory to achieve high success rates.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11814131     DOI: 10.1089/10926420152761923

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A        ISSN: 1092-6429            Impact factor:   1.878


  18 in total

1.  Laparoscopic management of CBD stones: an Indian experience.

Authors:  Jagdish Chander; Anubhav Vindal; Pawanindra Lal; Nikhil Gupta; Vinod Kumar Ramteke
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2010-06-10       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  Is the use of T-tube necessary after laparoscopic choledochotomy?

Authors:  Ahmed Abdel-Raouf El-Geidie
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-03-16       Impact factor: 3.452

3.  Primary closure versus T-tube drainage after common bile duct exploration for choledocholithiasis.

Authors:  Qian D Zhu; Chong L Tao; Meng T Zhou; Zheng P Yu; Hong Q Shi; Qi Y Zhang
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-27       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Comparison between intraoperative cholangiography and choledochoscopy for ductal clearance in laparoscopic CBD exploration: a prospective randomized study.

Authors:  Anubhav Vindal; Jagdish Chander; Pawanindra Lal; Balu Mahendra
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2014-08-26       Impact factor: 4.584

5.  A stone extraction facilitation device to achieve an improved technique for performing LCBDE.

Authors:  D E Wenner; P Whitwam; J Rosser; S Hashmi; D E Wenner
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-11-11       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 6.  Laparoscopic transcystic duct common bile duct exploration.

Authors:  S Lyass; E H Phillips
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2006-03-16       Impact factor: 4.584

7.  A randomized comparison of primary closure and T-tube drainage of the common bile duct after laparoscopic choledochotomy.

Authors:  Zhang Leida; Bie Ping; Wang Shuguang; He Yu
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2008-01-18       Impact factor: 4.584

8.  National analysis of in-hospital resource utilization in choledocholithiasis management using propensity scores.

Authors:  B K Poulose; P G Arbogast; M D Holzman
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2005-12-09       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 9.  Evidence-based clinical practice guidelines for cholelithiasis 2016.

Authors:  Susumu Tazuma; Michiaki Unno; Yoshinori Igarashi; Kazuo Inui; Kazuhisa Uchiyama; Masahiro Kai; Toshio Tsuyuguchi; Hiroyuki Maguchi; Toshiyuki Mori; Koji Yamaguchi; Shomei Ryozawa; Yuji Nimura; Naotaka Fujita; Keiichi Kubota; Junichi Shoda; Masami Tabata; Tetsuya Mine; Kentaro Sugano; Mamoru Watanabe; Tooru Shimosegawa
Journal:  J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-12-10       Impact factor: 7.527

10.  Management of choledocholithiasis: comparison between laparoscopic common bile duct exploration and intraoperative endoscopic sphincterotomy.

Authors:  Qi Wei; Jian-Guo Wang; Li-Bo Li; Jun-Da Li
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2003-12       Impact factor: 5.742

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.