Literature DB >> 11813807

Factors influencing predictive models for toxicology.

E Benfenati1, N Piclin, A Roncaglioni, M R Varì.   

Abstract

Comparisons of different models to predict toxicity and evaluation of the predictive power of a model are affected by the variability of the data. We assessed this problem by considering experimental toxicity data and chemical descriptors. We evaluated several toxicological end-points (Oncorhynchus mykiss, Daphnia magna, Acceptable Daily Intake, Anas Platyrhynchos, Colinus virginianus and Muridae) in the case of pesticides and also considered the availability of toxicological data. We calculated hundreds of molecular descriptors (divided into constitutional, electrostatic, geometrical, quantum-chemical and topological ones) for the selected compounds using CODESSA, HyperChem and Pallas. Molecular descriptors may vary depending on the conformation of the molecules and on the software used. We evaluated the extent of this variability, and compared it with the variability of the experimental toxicological values.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11813807     DOI: 10.1080/10629360108039836

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  SAR QSAR Environ Res        ISSN: 1026-776X            Impact factor:   3.000


  2 in total

1.  Characterizing cleft palate toxicants using ToxCast data, chemical structure, and the biomedical literature.

Authors:  Nancy C Baker; Nisha S Sipes; Jill Franzosa; David G Belair; Barbara D Abbott; Richard S Judson; Thomas B Knudsen
Journal:  Birth Defects Res       Date:  2019-08-30       Impact factor: 2.661

2.  Predicting toxicity through computers: a changing world.

Authors:  Emilio Benfenati
Journal:  Chem Cent J       Date:  2007-12-18       Impact factor: 4.215

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.