Literature DB >> 11813214

Time dependent memory decay.

Paul Jenkins1, Giulia Earle-Richardson, David Tucker Slingerland, John May.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To estimate the rate of time dependent memory decay, injury rates from three independent studies were compared.
METHODS: The studies asked subjects to recall injuries during the previous 2 months, 12 months, or 10 years.
RESULTS: The annual injury rates obtained were 108/1,000, 66/1,000, and 19/1,000, respectively. These rates are all significantly different from one another at the 0.05 level.
CONCLUSIONS: Important methodological and demographic differences between the studies, such as those involving age, injury severity, and seasonality, were ruled out as causes of these differences. Results found in the literature for other studies are compared and contrasted. These data suggest that recall periods of greater than 2 months are likely to significantly underestimate injury rates. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11813214     DOI: 10.1002/ajim.10035

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Ind Med        ISSN: 0271-3586            Impact factor:   2.214


  30 in total

1.  Injury prevention attitudes and awareness in New Zealand.

Authors:  R Hooper; C A Coggan; B Adams
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 2.399

2.  The association between EMS workplace safety culture and safety outcomes.

Authors:  Matthew D Weaver; Henry E Wang; Rollin J Fairbanks; Daniel Patterson
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011-09-27       Impact factor: 3.077

3.  Item response theory analysis of intimate-partner violence in a community sample.

Authors:  Anita Jose; Thomas M Olino; K Daniel O'Leary
Journal:  J Fam Psychol       Date:  2012-02-06

4.  Frequency and Circumstances of Falls Reported by Ambulatory Unilateral Lower Limb Prosthesis Users: A Secondary Analysis.

Authors:  Janis Kim; Matthew J Major; Brian Hafner; Andrew Sawers
Journal:  PM R       Date:  2019-01-15       Impact factor: 2.298

5.  Supervision and risk of unintentional injury in young children.

Authors:  Patricia G Schnitzer; M Denise Dowd; Robin L Kruse; Barbara A Morrongiello
Journal:  Inj Prev       Date:  2014-05-21       Impact factor: 2.399

6.  Using participant event monitoring in a cohort study of unintentional injuries among children and adolescents.

Authors:  J R Wilkins; J Mac Crawford; Lorann Stallones; Kathleen M Koechlin; Lei Shen; John Hayes; Thomas L Bean
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2006-12-28       Impact factor: 9.308

7.  The association between weekly work hours, crew familiarity, and occupational injury and illness in emergency medical services workers.

Authors:  Matthew D Weaver; P Daniel Patterson; Anthony Fabio; Charity G Moore; Matthew S Freiberg; Thomas J Songer
Journal:  Am J Ind Med       Date:  2015-08-25       Impact factor: 2.214

8.  Measuring teamwork and conflict among emergency medical technician personnel.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Sallie J Weaver; Michael A Rosen; Gergana Todorova; Laurie R Weingart; David Krackhardt; Judith R Lave; Robert M Arnold; Donald M Yealy; Eduardo Salas
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2012 Jan-Mar       Impact factor: 3.077

9.  Association between poor sleep, fatigue, and safety outcomes in emergency medical services providers.

Authors:  P Daniel Patterson; Matthew D Weaver; Rachel C Frank; Charles W Warner; Christian Martin-Gill; Francis X Guyette; Rollin J Fairbanks; Michael W Hubble; Thomas J Songer; Clifton W Callaway; Sheryl F Kelsey; David Hostler
Journal:  Prehosp Emerg Care       Date:  2011-10-24       Impact factor: 3.077

10.  Physical violence, self rated health, and morbidity: is gender significant for victimisation?

Authors:  V Sundaram; K Helweg-Larsen; B Laursen; P Bjerregaard
Journal:  J Epidemiol Community Health       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 3.710

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.