Literature DB >> 11811515

Histologic and radiographic evidence of vertical ridge augmentation utilizing distraction osteogenesis: 10 consecutively placed distractors.

B S McAllister1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Vertical ridge augmentation for dental implant placement is one of the greatest challenges facing the surgeon. Inadequate vertical bone compromises the implant positioning and resulting restoration. The cleansibility, esthetics, and mechanical properties of the restoration can all be compromised. While the technique of distraction osteogenesis has been successfully employed for long bone applications for over 40 years, it has only recently been introduced as a technique for vertical ridge augmentation prior to dental implant reconstruction.
METHODS: In this study, the placement of 10 consecutive distractors in 7 patients was evaluated. The surgical technique, latency period, distraction rate, and consolidation period are reviewed.
RESULTS: The technique of distraction osteogenesis resulted in an average vertical augmentation of 7 mm, with a range of 5 to 9 mm. There were no complications affecting the outcome of the distraction procedure. No failures have occurred to date in the 16 implants that were placed and loaded following distraction.
CONCLUSIONS: In summary, clinical, histologic, and radiographic evidence of consistent vertical bone augmentation was found with this technique of distraction osteogenesis for vertical ridge augmentation.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11811515     DOI: 10.1902/jop.2001.72.12.1767

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Periodontol        ISSN: 0022-3492            Impact factor:   6.993


  7 in total

1.  Study of Distracted Bone in Maxilla: A Comparative Analysis.

Authors:  Rohan Thomas Mathew; Mustafa Khader; Shehzana Fathima; B H Sripathi Rao
Journal:  J Maxillofac Oral Surg       Date:  2017-02-08

Review 2.  Bone regeneration during distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Lisa R Amir; Vincent Everts; Antonius L J J Bronckers
Journal:  Odontology       Date:  2009-07-29       Impact factor: 2.634

3.  Bone resorption and complications in alveolar distraction osteogenesis.

Authors:  Tobias Ettl; Till Gerlach; Thomas Schüsselbauer; Martin Gosau; Torsten E Reichert; Oliver Driemel
Journal:  Clin Oral Investig       Date:  2009-09-23       Impact factor: 3.573

4.  [Bidirectional and unidirectional distraction of defects of the alveolar process comparative clinical study].

Authors:  P Schleier; H G Siebert; Ch Wolf; A Berndt; D Schumann
Journal:  Mund Kiefer Gesichtschir       Date:  2006-03

5.  Use of a Simple Appliance to Prevent Mucosal Irritation by the Distractor Rod during Vertical Distraction: Case Report.

Authors:  Mehtap Muglali; Nukhet Celebi; Samet Inal; Burak Bekcioglu; Burcu Bas
Journal:  Eur J Dent       Date:  2008-07

Review 6.  Complications in the treatment with alveolar extraosseous distractors. Literature review.

Authors:  Alfredo Rodriguez-Grandjean; David Reininger; Juan López-Quiles
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2015-07-01

7.  20 years of alveolar distraction: A systematic review of the literature.

Authors:  M Pérez-Sayáns; J-M Martínez-Martín; C Chamorro-Petronacci; M Gallas-Torreira; X Marichalar-Mendía; A García-García
Journal:  Med Oral Patol Oral Cir Bucal       Date:  2018-11-01
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.