Literature DB >> 11810669

On the parameters affecting the sensitivity of MR measures of pressure with microbubbles.

Rohan Dharmakumar1, Donald B Plewes, Graham A Wright.   

Abstract

Recently, it has been suggested that gas encapsulated distensible microbubbles may serve as pressure probes in the MR field through the relationship between bubble size and 1/T(2) or 1/T(*)(2). Currently, in vivo application of this technique is hindered by the ability of T(2) or T(*)(2) to detect pressure changes that are clinically relevant. This work identifies and characterizes, through numerical simulations, the set of parameters which optimize the ability of this technique to detect small pressure changes. Results show that when the bubbles do not interact magnetically, the T(2)- and T(*)(2)-based measurements of pressure are strongly influenced by the bubble size at atmospheric pressure, static magnetic field strength, magnitude of the susceptibility difference between the encapsulated gas and plasma, bubble volume fraction, and the refocusing interval. In particular, to detect clinically relevant pressure changes, microbubbles need to be approximately 2-3 microm in radius, distributed at a volume fraction of 0.15%, and have a volumetric magnetic susceptibility difference of at least 34 ppm. Copyright 2002 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11810669     DOI: 10.1002/mrm.10075

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Magn Reson Med        ISSN: 0740-3194            Impact factor:   4.668


  5 in total

1.  Microbubbles in Imaging: Applications Beyond Ultrasound.

Authors:  Paul Kogan; Ryan C Gessner; Paul A Dayton
Journal:  Bubble Sci Eng Technol       Date:  2010-06

2.  Ultrasound for molecular imaging and therapy in cancer.

Authors:  Osamu F Kaneko; Jürgen K Willmann
Journal:  Quant Imaging Med Surg       Date:  2012-06

3.  Parametric dependence of myocardial blood oxygen level dependent, balanced steady-state free-precession imaging at 1.5 T: theory and experiments.

Authors:  Xiangzhi Zhou; Richard Tang; Rachel Klein; Debiao Li; Rohan Dharmakumar
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 4.668

4.  Evaluation of microbubbles as contrast agents for ultrasonography and magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Ling Li; Qiang Wei; Hong-Bo Li; Song Wen; Gao-Jun Teng
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-10       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Design and testing of microbubble-based MRI contrast agents for gastric pressure measurement.

Authors:  Edwin Abdurakman; Martin Bencsik; Gareth W V Cave; Caroline L Hoad; Scott McGowan; David J Fairhurst; Giles Major; Penny A Gowland; Richard Bowtell
Journal:  Magn Reson Med       Date:  2019-09-16       Impact factor: 4.668

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.