Literature DB >> 11810597

Comparative in-vitro activity of carbapenem antibiotics against respiratory pathogens isolated between 1999 and 2000.

A Watanabe1, Y Tokue, H Takahashi, T Kikuchi, T Kobayashi, K Gomi, S Fujimura, S Yasui, Y Murayama, T Nukiwa.   

Abstract

We investigated the antibacterial activity of 12 antibiotics, inclusive of four carbapenems, against 167 strains of respiratory pathogens isolated between 1999 and 2000. Thirty strains of methicillin-susceptible Staphylococcus aureus (MSSA), 28 strains of methicillin-resistant S. aureus (MRSA), 11 strains of penicillin-susceptible Streptococcus pneumoniae (PSSP), 29 strains of penicillin-resistant S. pneumoniae (PRSP), 30 strains of Pseudomonas aeruginosa, 14 strains of Moraxella catarrhalis, and 25 strains of Haemophilus influenzae were examined. The minimum inhibitory concentration (MICs)50/90 (microg/ml) of imipenem, panipenem, meropenem, and biapenem against the clinical isolates obtained between 1999 and 2000 were: 0.06/0.25, 0.12/0.25, 0.12/0.25, and 0.12/0.25, respectively, against MSSA; 16/32, 16/32, 16/32, and 8/32 against MRSA; < or = 0.015/0.06, < or = 0.015/0.03, 0.03/0.12, and < or = 0.015/0.06 against PSSP; 0.12/0.25, 0.03/0.06, 0.25/0.5, and 0.12/0.25 against PRSP; 1/8, 2/8, 0.5/2, and 2/16 against P. aeruginosa; 0.06/0.06, 0.03/0.06, < or = 0.015/0.06, and 0.06/0.12 against M. catarrhalis; and 1/4, 1/4, 0.12/0.25, and 2/4 against H. influenzae. A comparison of the antibacterial activity of the four carbapenems with that found in our previous studies showed no significant difference in the susceptibility of clinical isolates, except for a slight decrease in the susceptibility of MSSA. Carbapenems have remained effective for severe infections. The MIC data showed that imipenem and panipenem were more active than meropenem and biapenem against gram-positive bacteria, and that meropenem and biapenem were more active than imipenem and panipenem against gram-negative bacteria. As only meropenem had an MIC90 below the breakpoint of pneumonia against all species except MRSA, meropenem was considered to be the most potent of the four carbapenems studied.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11810597     DOI: 10.1007/s101560170026

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Infect Chemother        ISSN: 1341-321X            Impact factor:   2.211


  5 in total

1.  Comparison of the pharmacodynamics of biapenem in bronchial epithelial lining fluid in healthy volunteers given half-hour and three-hour intravenous infusions.

Authors:  Eiki Kikuchi; Junko Kikuchi; Yasuyuki Nasuhara; Satoshi Oizumi; Akitoshi Ishizaka; Masaharu Nishimura
Journal:  Antimicrob Agents Chemother       Date:  2009-04-20       Impact factor: 5.191

Review 2.  Panipenem/betamipron.

Authors:  Karen L Goa; Stuart Noble
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2003       Impact factor: 9.546

Review 3.  Biapenem.

Authors:  Caroline M Perry; Tim Ibbotson
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  2002       Impact factor: 9.546

4.  Rapid Identification of Mycoplasma bovis Strains from Bovine Bronchoalveolar Lavage Fluid with Matrix-Assisted Laser Desorption Ionization-Time of Flight Mass Spectrometry after Enrichment Procedure.

Authors:  Bart Pardon; Filip Boyen; Jade Bokma; Laura Van Driessche; Piet Deprez; Freddy Haesebrouck; Marianne Vahl; Eefke Weesendorp; Ruud H Deurenberg
Journal:  J Clin Microbiol       Date:  2020-05-26       Impact factor: 5.948

Review 5.  New treatment options against gram-negative organisms.

Authors:  Matteo Bassetti; Francesca Ginocchio; Malgorzata Mikulska
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 9.097

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.