Literature DB >> 11809787

The efficiency of an asynchronous flight muscle from a beetle.

R K Josephson1, J G Malamud, D R Stokes.   

Abstract

Mechanical power output and metabolic power input were measured from an asynchronous flight muscle, the basalar muscle of the beetle Cotinus mutabilis. Mechanical power output was determined using the work loop technique and metabolic power input by monitoring CO(2) production or both CO(2) production and O(2) consumption. At 35 degrees C, and with conditions that maximized power output (60 Hz sinusoidal strain, optimal muscle length and strain amplitude, 60 Hz stimulation frequency), the peak mechanical power output during a 10 s burst was approximately 140 W kg(-1), the respiratory coefficient 0.83 and the muscle efficiency 14-16 %. The stimulus intensity used was the minimal required to achieve a maximal isometric tetanus. Increasing or decreasing the stimulus intensity from this level changed mechanical power output but not efficiency, indicating that the efficiency measurements were not contaminated by excitation of muscles adjacent to that from which the mechanical recordings were made. The CO(2) produced during an isometric tetanus was approximately half that during a bout of similar stimulation but with imposed sinusoidal strain and work output, suggesting that up to 50 % of the energy input may go to muscle activation costs. Reducing the stimulus frequency to 30 Hz from its usual value of 60 Hz reduced mechanical power output but had no significant effect on efficiency. Increasing the frequency of the sinusoidal strain from 60 to 90 Hz reduced power output but not CO(2) consumption; hence, there was a decline in efficiency. The respiratory coefficient was the same for 10 s and 30 s bursts of activity, suggesting that there was no major change in the fuel used over this time range. The mass-specific mechanical power output and the efficiency of the beetle muscle were each 2-3 times greater than values measured in previous studies, using similar techniques, from locust flight muscles, which are synchronous muscles. These results support the hypothesis that asynchronous flight muscles have evolved in several major insect taxa because they can provide greater power output and are more efficient than are synchronous muscles for operation at the high frequencies of insect flight.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11809787     DOI: 10.1242/jeb.204.23.4125

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Biol        ISSN: 0022-0949            Impact factor:   3.312


  6 in total

1.  Ca-activation and stretch-activation in insect flight muscle.

Authors:  Marco Linari; Michael K Reedy; Mary C Reedy; Vincenzo Lombardi; Gabriella Piazzesi
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2004-08       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Energetics of the smallest: Do bacteria breathe at the same rate as whales?

Authors:  Anastassia M Makarieva; Victor G Gorshkov; Bai-Lian Li
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2005-10-22       Impact factor: 5.349

3.  Stretch activation properties of Drosophila and Lethocerus indirect flight muscle suggest similar calcium-dependent mechanisms.

Authors:  Bernadette M Glasheen; Catherine C Eldred; Leah C Sullivan; Cuiping Zhao; Michael K Reedy; Robert J Edwards; Douglas M Swank
Journal:  Am J Physiol Cell Physiol       Date:  2017-08-23       Impact factor: 4.249

4.  The roles of troponin C isoforms in the mechanical function of Drosophila indirect flight muscle.

Authors:  Catherine C Eldred; Anja Katzemich; Monica Patel; Belinda Bullard; Douglas M Swank
Journal:  J Muscle Res Cell Motil       Date:  2014-08-19       Impact factor: 2.698

5.  High Energy and Power Density Peptidoglycan Muscles through Super-Viscous Nanoconfined Water.

Authors:  Haozhen Wang; Zhi-Lun Liu; Jianpei Lao; Sheng Zhang; Rinat Abzalimov; Tong Wang; Xi Chen
Journal:  Adv Sci (Weinh)       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 17.521

6.  The cibarial pump of the xylem-feeding froghopper Philaenus spumarius produces negative pressures exceeding 1 MPa.

Authors:  Elisabeth A Bergman; Emma L Green; Philip G D Matthews
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2021-07-14       Impact factor: 5.530

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.