| Literature DB >> 11809489 |
Veerle Gysen1, Peter De Graef, Karl Verfaillie.
Abstract
In a display with a stationary and a moving object, subjects saccaded towards one of the objects and had to detect intrasaccadic changes in position or orientation of either the saccade target or the saccade flanker. Compared to performance for stationary objects, displacement detection for translating objects was better and unaffected by saccadic status of the changed object. This pattern proved to be specific to position changes in translating objects and did not generalize to other types of motion (i.e., rotation) or to other types of intrasaccadic changes (i.e., orientation shifts). Superior transsaccadic coding of the position of a translating object was also observed in control experiments with only a single object present on each trial. Possible accounts in terms of selective attention to moving objects and perceptual relevance of object position are pitted against the data, suggesting qualitative differences in the transsaccadic representation of translating and stationary objects.Mesh:
Year: 2002 PMID: 11809489 DOI: 10.1016/s0042-6989(01)00296-6
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Vision Res ISSN: 0042-6989 Impact factor: 1.886