K K Nicodemus1, D R Jacobs, A R Folsom. 1. Division of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, University of Minnesota, Minneapolis 55454-1015, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between whole and refined grain intake and risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer. Findings from case-control studies of whole and refined grain intake and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer have been inconclusive. METHODS: The Iowa Women's Health Study is a prospective cohort study of women initially 55-69 years old that relates diet and other lifestyle factors to cancer risk. After exclusions a total of 29,119 menopausal women who answered a 1986 baseline and a 1989 follow-up questionnaire were followed for 9 years for incident breast cancer. RESULTS: Compared to women who at baseline rarely ate whole grain foods, women who habitually ate whole grain had a healthier lifestyle, including a higher likelihood of prior screening mammography. The multivariate-adjusted risk of incident breast cancer was 20% higher in women in the highest quintile of whole grain intake, compared to women in the lowest quintile of whole grain intake (95% confidence interval 0.95-1.5; p-value for trend = 0.03). No increase in breast cancer risk was found in women who had not undergone screening mammography before 1989; the apparent increase in risk was therefore likely due to increased use of screening mammography. Refined grain intake was not associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Consistent with inverse but not statistically significant associations between whole grain intake and breast cancer in case-control studies, both whole and refined grain intakes are unrelated to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in these Iowa women.
OBJECTIVE: To assess the relation between whole and refined grain intake and risk of incident postmenopausal breast cancer. Findings from case-control studies of whole and refined grain intake and risk of postmenopausal breast cancer have been inconclusive. METHODS: The Iowa Women's Health Study is a prospective cohort study of women initially 55-69 years old that relates diet and other lifestyle factors to cancer risk. After exclusions a total of 29,119 menopausal women who answered a 1986 baseline and a 1989 follow-up questionnaire were followed for 9 years for incident breast cancer. RESULTS: Compared to women who at baseline rarely ate whole grain foods, women who habitually ate whole grain had a healthier lifestyle, including a higher likelihood of prior screening mammography. The multivariate-adjusted risk of incident breast cancer was 20% higher in women in the highest quintile of whole grain intake, compared to women in the lowest quintile of whole grain intake (95% confidence interval 0.95-1.5; p-value for trend = 0.03). No increase in breast cancer risk was found in women who had not undergone screening mammography before 1989; the apparent increase in risk was therefore likely due to increased use of screening mammography. Refined grain intake was not associated with breast cancer risk. CONCLUSION: Consistent with inverse but not statistically significant associations between whole grain intake and breast cancer in case-control studies, both whole and refined grain intakes are unrelated to risk of postmenopausal breast cancer in these Iowa women.
Authors: Natalia Tumas; Camila Niclis; Laura R Aballay; Alberto R Osella; María del Pilar Díaz Journal: Eur J Nutr Date: 2013-08-02 Impact factor: 5.614
Authors: Nour Makarem; Elisa V Bandera; Yong Lin; Nicola M McKeown; Richard B Hayes; Niyati Parekh Journal: Nutr Cancer Date: 2018-05-21 Impact factor: 2.900
Authors: Hongyu Wu; Alan J Flint; Qibin Qi; Rob M van Dam; Laura A Sampson; Eric B Rimm; Michelle D Holmes; Walter C Willett; Frank B Hu; Qi Sun Journal: JAMA Intern Med Date: 2015-03 Impact factor: 21.873
Authors: Maryam S Farvid; Eunyoung Cho; A Heather Eliassen; Wendy Y Chen; Walter C Willett Journal: Breast Cancer Res Treat Date: 2016-08-10 Impact factor: 4.872
Authors: H Cai; E A Hudson; P Mann; R D Verschoyle; P Greaves; M M Manson; W P Steward; A J Gescher Journal: Br J Cancer Date: 2004-10-04 Impact factor: 7.640