Literature DB >> 11807947

Potential of mean force for protein-protein interaction studies.

Lin Jiang1, Ying Gao, Fenglou Mao, Zhijie Liu, Luhua Lai.   

Abstract

Calculating protein-protein interaction energies is crucial for understanding protein-protein associations. On the basis of the methodology of mean-field potential, we have developed an empirical approach to estimate binding free energy for protein-protein interactions. This knowledge-based approach has been used to derive distance-dependent free energies of protein complexes from a nonredundant training set in the Protein Data Bank (PDB), with a careful treatment of homology. We calculate atom pair potentials for 16 pair interactions, which can reflect the importance of hydrophobic interactions and specific hydrogen-bonding interactions. The derived potentials for hydrogen-bonding interactions show a valley of favorable interactions at a distance of approximately 3 A, corresponding to that of an established hydrogen bond. For the test set of 28 protein complexes, the calculated energies have a correlation coefficient of 0.75 compared with experimental binding free energies. The performance of the method in ranking the binding energies of different protein-protein complexes shows that the energy estimation can be applied to value binding free energies for protein-protein associations. Copyright 2001 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11807947     DOI: 10.1002/prot.10031

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Proteins        ISSN: 0887-3585


  30 in total

1.  Development of unified statistical potentials describing protein-protein interactions.

Authors:  Hui Lu; Long Lu; Jeffrey Skolnick
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 4.033

2.  Prediction of protein-protein binding free energies.

Authors:  Thom Vreven; Howook Hwang; Brian G Pierce; Zhiping Weng
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2012-02-02       Impact factor: 6.725

3.  Computational alanine scanning with linear scaling semiempirical quantum mechanical methods.

Authors:  David J Diller; Christine Humblet; Xiaohua Zhang; Lance M Westerhoff
Journal:  Proteins       Date:  2010-08-01

4.  A structure-based benchmark for protein-protein binding affinity.

Authors:  Panagiotis L Kastritis; Iain H Moal; Howook Hwang; Zhiping Weng; Paul A Bates; Alexandre M J J Bonvin; Joël Janin
Journal:  Protein Sci       Date:  2011-02-16       Impact factor: 6.725

5.  Incorporating specificity into optimization: evaluation of SPA using CSAR 2014 and CASF 2013 benchmarks.

Authors:  Zhiqiang Yan; Jin Wang
Journal:  J Comput Aided Mol Des       Date:  2016-02-15       Impact factor: 3.686

6.  A molecular-mechanical model of the microtubule.

Authors:  Maxim I Molodtsov; Elena A Ermakova; Emmanuil E Shnol; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; J Richard McIntosh; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-02-18       Impact factor: 4.033

7.  Force production by depolymerizing microtubules: a theoretical study.

Authors:  M I Molodtsov; E L Grishchuk; A K Efremov; J R McIntosh; F I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-03-14       Impact factor: 11.205

8.  Classical nucleation theory of virus capsids.

Authors:  Roya Zandi; Paul van der Schoot; David Reguera; Willem Kegel; Howard Reiss
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2005-12-30       Impact factor: 4.033

9.  A free-rotating and self-avoiding chain model for deriving statistical potentials based on protein structures.

Authors:  Ji Cheng; Jianfeng Pei; Luhua Lai
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2007-03-09       Impact factor: 4.033

10.  In search of an optimal ring to couple microtubule depolymerization to processive chromosome motions.

Authors:  Artem Efremov; Ekaterina L Grishchuk; J Richard McIntosh; Fazly I Ataullakhanov
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2007-11-20       Impact factor: 11.205

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.