Literature DB >> 11807926

Psychometric functions for the olfactory and trigeminal detectability of butyl acetate and toluene.

J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz1, William S Cain, Michael H Abraham, Joelle M R Gola.   

Abstract

We measured psychometric (i.e. concentration-response) functions for the detection of odor, nasal pungency and eye irritation from butyl acetate and toluene. Olfactory detection was measured in subjects with normal olfaction (i.e. normosmics) for whom nasal trigeminal detection does not interfere because it requires much higher concentrations. Nasal trigeminal detection, called nasal pungency, was measured only in subjects lacking olfaction (i.e. anosmics) in order to avoid odor interference. Ocular trigeminal detection, called eye irritation, was measured in both groups. The method employed entailed a two-alternative, forced-choice procedure with presentation of increasing concentrations. The outcome showed, for both chemicals, similar ocular trigeminal chemosensitivity in normosmics and anosmics and similar overall ocular and nasal trigeminal chemosensitivity. Olfactory sensitivity was much higher than both forms of trigeminal sensitivity by concentration differences of six and four orders of magnitude for butyl acetate and toluene, respectively. Detectability plots (i.e. detection performance vs log concentration) for the three sensory endpoints followed an S-shaped function with a middle range section that showed a robust linear fit (r > 0.94) on graphs of z-score vs log concentration. These detectability functions allow the calculation of olfactory and trigeminal thresholds at various levels of performance. At a point half-way between random and perfect detection, trigeminal and olfactory threshold concentrations were, respectively, 0.67 (+/-0.32) and 2.28 (+/-1.77) log units lower than those measured by us in the past for the same chemicals using an analogous procedure but under just one, fixed, level of performance. The available data suggest that, although considerably laborious, detectability functions provide chemosensory thresholds of closer relevance to environmentally realistic conditions (e.g. whole-body exposures). Copyright 2002 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11807926     DOI: 10.1002/jat.822

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Appl Toxicol        ISSN: 0260-437X            Impact factor:   3.446


  10 in total

1.  From chemosensory thresholds to whole body exposures-experimental approaches evaluating chemosensory effects of chemicals.

Authors:  Christoph van Thriel; Michael Schäper; Ernst Kiesswetter; Stefan Kleinbeck; Stephanie Juran; Meinolf Blaszkewicz; Hajo-Hennig Fricke; Lilo Altmann; Hans Berresheim; Thomas Brüning
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2006-01-06       Impact factor: 3.015

2.  Cutoff in detection of eye irritation from vapors of homologous carboxylic acids and aliphatic aldehydes.

Authors:  J E Cometto-Muñiz; W S Cain; M H Abraham; R Sánchez-Moreno
Journal:  Neuroscience       Date:  2007-01-30       Impact factor: 3.590

3.  The behavioral sensitivity of mice to acetate esters.

Authors:  Liam Jennings; Ellie Williams; Marta Avlas; Adam Dewan
Journal:  Chem Senses       Date:  2022-01-01       Impact factor: 4.985

4.  Concentration-detection functions for the odor of homologous n-acetate esters.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain; Michael H Abraham; Javier Gil-Lostes
Journal:  Physiol Behav       Date:  2008-10-08

5.  Characterization of an inhaled toluene drug discrimination in mice: effect of exposure conditions and route of administration.

Authors:  Keith L Shelton; Galina Slavova-Hernandez
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2009-03-04       Impact factor: 3.533

6.  A cut-off in ocular chemesthesis from vapors of homologous alkylbenzenes and 2-ketones as revealed by concentration-detection functions.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Toxicol Appl Pharmacol       Date:  2008-04-01       Impact factor: 4.219

7.  Discriminative stimulus effects of inhaled 1,1,1-trichloroethane in mice: comparison to other hydrocarbon vapors and volatile anesthetics.

Authors:  Keith L Shelton
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2008-10-30       Impact factor: 4.530

8.  The biological and toxicological activity of gases and vapors.

Authors:  Michael H Abraham; Ricardo Sánchez-Moreno; Javier Gil-Lostes; William E Acree; J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; William S Cain
Journal:  Toxicol In Vitro       Date:  2009-11-12       Impact factor: 3.500

9.  Human olfactory detection of homologous n-alcohols measured via concentration-response functions.

Authors:  J Enrique Cometto-Muñiz; Michael H Abraham
Journal:  Pharmacol Biochem Behav       Date:  2008-01-07       Impact factor: 3.533

10.  Ocular surface and tear film changes in workers exposed to organic solvents used in the dry-cleaning industry.

Authors:  Ingrid Astrid Jiménez Barbosa; Martha Fabiola Rodríguez Alvarez; Gerardo Andrés Dussán Torres; Sieu K Khuu
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-12-09       Impact factor: 3.240

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.