Literature DB >> 11807382

Phakic intraocular lenses.

Ian F Comaish1, Michael A Lawless.   

Abstract

Since Zaldivar's review of phakic intraocular lenses in these pages in 2000 [1**], further reports of experience with this technology have emerged. Their relative advantages and disadvantages over competing technologies are becoming clearer. Clinical trials, including Food & Drug Administration (FDA) trials, have shown predictability, stability, and efficacy. Safety of these implants over the long term remains a concern, but in some situations, at least, phakic intraocular lenses are becoming the refractive correction of choice. This brief review looks at the most recent data to emerge regarding phakic intraocular lenses.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11807382     DOI: 10.1097/00055735-200202000-00003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Curr Opin Ophthalmol        ISSN: 1040-8738            Impact factor:   3.761


  3 in total

Review 1.  [Phakic intraocular lenses. Current status and limitations].

Authors:  H B Dick; M Tehrani
Journal:  Ophthalmologe       Date:  2004-03       Impact factor: 1.059

Review 2.  The posterior chamber phakic refractive lens (PRL): a review.

Authors:  R J Pérez-Cambrodí; D P Piñero; T Ferrer-Blasco; A Cerviño; R Brautaset
Journal:  Eye (Lond)       Date:  2012-12-07       Impact factor: 3.775

3.  Severe pigment dispersion after iris-claw phakic intraocular lens implantation.

Authors:  Virgilio Galvis; Néstor I Carreño; Alejandro Tello; Andrea N Laiton
Journal:  Indian J Ophthalmol       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 1.848

  3 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.