AIMS: To determine bacterial loads in meningococcal disease (MCD), their relation with disease severity, and the factors which determine bacterial load. METHODS: Meningococcal DNA quantification was performed by the Taqman PCR method on admission and sequential blood samples from patients with MCD. Disease severity was assessed using the Glasgow Septicaemia Prognostic Score (GMSPS, range 0-15, severe disease > or =8). RESULTS: Median admission bacterial load was 1.6 x 10(6) DNA copies/ml of blood (range 2.2 x 10(4) to 1.6 x 10(8)). Bacterial load was significantly higher in patients with severe (8.4 x 10(6)) compared to milder disease (1.1 x 10(6), p = 0.018). This difference was greater in septicaemic patients (median 1.6 x 10(7) versus 9.2 x 10(5), p < 0.001). Bacterial loads were significantly higher in patients that died (p = 0.017). Admission bacterial load was independent of the duration of clinical symptoms prior to admission, with no difference between the duration of symptoms in mild or severe cases (median, 10.5 and 11 hours respectively). Bacterial loads were independent of DNA elimination rates following treatment. CONCLUSION: Patients with MCD have higher bacterial loads than previously determined with quantitative culture methods. Admission bacterial load is significantly higher in patients with severe disease (GMSPS > or =8) and maximum load is highest in those who die. Bacterial load is independent of the duration of clinical symptoms or the decline in DNA load.
AIMS: To determine bacterial loads in meningococcal disease (MCD), their relation with disease severity, and the factors which determine bacterial load. METHODS:Meningococcal DNA quantification was performed by the Taqman PCR method on admission and sequential blood samples from patients with MCD. Disease severity was assessed using the Glasgow Septicaemia Prognostic Score (GMSPS, range 0-15, severe disease > or =8). RESULTS: Median admission bacterial load was 1.6 x 10(6) DNA copies/ml of blood (range 2.2 x 10(4) to 1.6 x 10(8)). Bacterial load was significantly higher in patients with severe (8.4 x 10(6)) compared to milder disease (1.1 x 10(6), p = 0.018). This difference was greater in septicaemic patients (median 1.6 x 10(7) versus 9.2 x 10(5), p < 0.001). Bacterial loads were significantly higher in patients that died (p = 0.017). Admission bacterial load was independent of the duration of clinical symptoms prior to admission, with no difference between the duration of symptoms in mild or severe cases (median, 10.5 and 11 hours respectively). Bacterial loads were independent of DNA elimination rates following treatment. CONCLUSION:Patients with MCD have higher bacterial loads than previously determined with quantitative culture methods. Admission bacterial load is significantly higher in patients with severe disease (GMSPS > or =8) and maximum load is highest in those who die. Bacterial load is independent of the duration of clinical symptoms or the decline in DNA load.
Authors: M A Sobanski; R A Barnes; S J Gray; A D Carr; E B Kaczmarski; A O'Rourke; K Murphy; M Cafferkey; R W Ellis; K Pidcock; P Hawtin; W T Coakley Journal: Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis Date: 2000-04 Impact factor: 3.267
Authors: R C Read; N J Camp; F S di Giovine; R Borrow; E B Kaczmarski; A G Chaudhary; A J Fox; G W Duff Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 2000-10-09 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: H Uronen; A J Williams; G Dixon; S R Andersen; P Van Der Ley; M Van Deuren; R E Callard; N Klein Journal: Clin Exp Immunol Date: 2000-12 Impact factor: 4.330
Authors: R G Westendorp; J A Langermans; T W Huizinga; A H Elouali; C L Verweij; D I Boomsma; J P Vandenbroucke; J P Vandenbrouke Journal: Lancet Date: 1997-01-18 Impact factor: 79.321
Authors: M van Deuren; J van der Ven-Jongekrijg; A K Bartelink; R van Dalen; R W Sauerwein; J W van der Meer Journal: J Infect Dis Date: 1995-08 Impact factor: 5.226
Authors: Richard Rothman; Padmini Ramachandran; Samuel Yang; Andrew Hardick; Helen Won; Aleksandar Kecojevic; Celeste Quianzon; Yu-Hsiang Hsieh; Charlotte Gaydos Journal: Acad Emerg Med Date: 2010-07 Impact factor: 3.451