Literature DB >> 11806067

Dental device-associated problems: an analysis of FDA postmarket surveillance data.

J Fuller1, C Parmentier.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The authors provide an analysis of dental device adverse event reports collected through the U.S. Food and Drug Administration's, or FDA's, mandatory and voluntary reporting programs between Aug. 1, 1996, and June 30, 1999.
METHODS: This study includes an analysis of the total number of dental device adverse events reported during the study period and uses descriptive statistics to depict reporters' occupations, types of adverse events (deaths, injuries, malfunctions), device categories, device problems and patient problems.
RESULTS: A total of 272,241 device reports were received during the 35-month study period, 28,555 (10.5 percent) of which involved dental devices. Within these reports, two deaths (0.007 percent), 18,406 injuries (64.4 percent) and 9,942 device malfunctions (34.8 percent) were reported. The most commonly reported dental devices were endosseous implants, which represented more than 90 percent of all dental device reports. Most reports (84.1 percent) provided the reporter's occupation, and the most frequently cited occupation was dentist (76.3 percent), followed by dental assistant (4.2 percent).
CONCLUSIONS: Dentists and dental staff members are a vital link in the FDA's adverse event reporting system and are encouraged to report device problems to the FDA MedWatch program.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11806067     DOI: 10.14219/jada.archive.2001.0087

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc        ISSN: 0002-8177            Impact factor:   3.634


  2 in total

1.  The dangers of dental devices as reported in the Food and Drug Administration Manufacturer and User Facility Device Experience Database.

Authors:  Nutan B Hebballi; Rachel Ramoni; Elsbeth Kalenderian; Veronique F Delattre; Denice C L Stewart; Karla Kent; Joel M White; Ram Vaderhobli; Muhammad F Walji
Journal:  J Am Dent Assoc       Date:  2015-02       Impact factor: 3.634

2.  Monitoring device safety in interventional cardiology.

Authors:  Michael E Matheny; Lucila Ohno-Machado; Frederic S Resnic
Journal:  J Am Med Inform Assoc       Date:  2005-12-15       Impact factor: 4.497

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.