Literature DB >> 11805785

The value of Waters' projection for assessing maxillary sinus inflammatory disease.

Nicolaas Timmenga1, Boudewijn Stegenga, Gerry Raghoebar, Jos van Hoogstraten, Ranny van Weissenbruch, Arjan Vissink.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The significance of the Waters' projection for judging maxillary mucosal disease is, at the least, questionable. The aim of this study was to evaluate the diagnostic use of Waters' projection of the maxillary sinus with particular regard to sinus mucosal swelling as a consistent sign of maxillary sinusitis. STUDY
DESIGN: Forty consecutive adult patients were referred to an ear, nose, and throat surgeon for pain in the region of the paranasal sinus, recurrent mucopurulent rhinorrhea, and nasal congestion or obstruction for at least 3 months without any response to conservative treatment. Both conventional radiographs (Waters' projection) and coronal and axial computed tomography (CT) scanning of the maxillary sinuses were recorded. The conventional radiographs and CT scans, all made within an hour, were blinded and assessed in random order by 2 independent well-trained observers with standard radiodiagnostic criteria for sinus mucosal swelling. Intraobserver and interobserver agreements were quantified by calculating Cohen's kappa. The diagnostic significance of the Waters' projection was assessed with the CT scan images as criterion standard by calculating sensitivity and specificity, positive predictive value, likelihood ratio, and diagnostic odds ratio.
RESULTS: Cohen's kappa for the intraobserver agreement of Waters' examination was 0.96, and the intraobserver agreement for CT scanning was 0.92. The interobserver agreement for Waters' projection and CT scanning was 0.76 and 0.92, respectively. With CT scanning as criterion standard, the sensitivity and specificity of Waters' projections to detect maxillary sinus mucosal swelling were 83.3% and 69.2%, respectively. The positive predictive (diagnostic) value of Waters' projections was 83.3%, the positive likelihood ratio 2.7, and the diagnostic odds ratio 11.25.
CONCLUSIONS: From this study it can be concluded that Waters' projections do not necessarily rule out the presence of maxillary sinus mucosal swelling. Additional examinations may be indicated, especially in patients with compromised sinus clearance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805785     DOI: 10.1067/moe.2002.120056

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod        ISSN: 1079-2104


  4 in total

1.  Association of adenoid hyperplasia and bacterial biofilm formation in children with adenoiditis in Taiwan.

Authors:  Chia-Der Lin; Mang-Hung Tsai; Cheng-Wen Lin; Mao-Wang Ho; Chin-Yuan Wang; Yung-An Tsou; Ming-Ching Kao; Ming-Hsui Tsai; Chih-Ho Lai
Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol       Date:  2011-07-22       Impact factor: 2.503

2.  Transfer learning in diagnosis of maxillary sinusitis using panoramic radiography and conventional radiography.

Authors:  Shinya Kotaki; Takahito Nishiguchi; Marino Araragi; Hironori Akiyama; Motoki Fukuda; Eiichiro Ariji; Yoshiko Ariji
Journal:  Oral Radiol       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 1.882

3.  Diagnostic Efficacy of Digital Waters' and Caldwell's Radiographic Views for Evaluation of Sinonasal Area.

Authors:  Hamed Ebrahimnejad; Seyed Hosein Hoseini Zarch; Adineh Javadian Langaroodi
Journal:  J Dent (Tehran)       Date:  2016-09

4.  Volumetric study of the maxillary sinus in patients with sinus pathology.

Authors:  Mario Pérez Sayáns; Juan A Suárez Quintanilla; Cintia M Chamorro Petronacci; José M Suárez Peñaranda; Pía López Jornet; Francisco Gómez García; Yolanda Guerrero Sánchez
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2020-06-18       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.