Literature DB >> 11805646

The use of a side-opening injection cannula in vertebroplasty: a technical note.

Paul F Heini1, C Dain Allred.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A human cadaveric investigation was conducted to determine the effect that a side-opening injection cannula in monopedicular percutaneous vertebroplasty had on the vertebrae filling pattern.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the filling pattern in vertebroplasty using a monopedicular technique, and to compare a standard front-opening filling cannula with a side-opening cannula. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Vertebroplasty is an effective treatment for osteoporotic vertebral fractures. Clinical and biomechanical investigations show its efficacy even in asymmetrical filling patterns. However, the risk of cement extravasation is a major concern with this technique.
METHODS: Two different bone cement-injecting cannulas were compared: a standard front-opening cannula (8 gauge, 6 inches long) and a cannula of the same dimensions with a side-opening at its distal end. Eight pairs of osteoporotic nonfractured cadaver vertebrae (T10-T11) were augmented with low-viscosity polymethylmethacrylate under axial C-arm control. The filling pattern was assessed semiquantitatively. The cross-section in its lateral extension was divided into four equal bands, and the appearance of the cement in each respective zone was assessed after cement injections of 2, 4, and 8 mL. The extravasation of bone cement also was monitored.
RESULTS: With the side-opening cannula, the cement flow reached Zone 3 in six of eight cases, whereas with the front-opening cannula, the polymethylmethacrylate was observed in Zone 3 in only three cases. In no case was the cement observed in Zone 4. In five of eight cases using front-opening cannulas, extravasation into the vessels was observed after 3 to 4 mL of bone cement had been injected. No extravasation was noted with the use of the side-opening cannula unless the amount of cement exceeded 8 mL.
CONCLUSIONS: A side-opening cannula can improve the cement-filling pattern in monopedicular vertebroplasty, as compared with a standard front-opening cannula. The risk of extravasation is diminished if the cement flow is directed medially.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805646     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  8 in total

1.  [Vertebroplasty in severe osteoporosis. Technique and experience with multi-segment injection].

Authors:  P F Heini; R Orler
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-01       Impact factor: 1.087

2.  [CT-based analysis of cement distribution in unipedicular vertebroplasty].

Authors:  M Walz; E Esmer; B Kolbow
Journal:  Unfallchirurg       Date:  2006-11       Impact factor: 1.000

Review 3.  Balloon kyphoplasty versus percutaneous vertebroplasty for treatment of osteoporotic vertebral compression fractures (OVCFs).

Authors:  G Zhao; X Liu; F Li
Journal:  Osteoporos Int       Date:  2016-04-27       Impact factor: 4.507

Review 4.  [Percutaneous vertebroplasty (pv): indications, contraindications, and technique].

Authors:  R T Hoffmann; T F Jakobs; A Wallnöfer; M F Reiser; T K Helmberger
Journal:  Radiologe       Date:  2003-09       Impact factor: 0.635

5.  Percutaneous cement augmentation for the treatment of depression fractures of the tibial plateau.

Authors:  D S Evangelopoulos; S Heitkemper; S Eggli; U Haupt; A K Exadaktylos; L M Benneker
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2009-12-15       Impact factor: 4.342

Review 6.  Percutaneous vertebroplasty in tumoral osteolysis.

Authors:  T F Jakobs; C Trumm; M Reiser; R T Hoffmann
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2007-02-03       Impact factor: 7.034

Review 7.  Controversial issues in kyphoplasty and vertebroplasty in osteoporotic vertebral fractures.

Authors:  Ioannis D Papanastassiou; Andreas Filis; Maria A Gerochristou; Frank D Vrionis
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2014-03-04       Impact factor: 3.411

8.  Bone cement allocation analysis in artificial cancellous bone structures.

Authors:  Ivan Zderic; Philipp Steinmetz; Lorin M Benneker; Christoph Sprecher; Oliver Röhrle; Markus Windolf; Andreas Boger; Boyko Gueorguiev
Journal:  J Orthop Translat       Date:  2016-10-04       Impact factor: 5.191

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.