Literature DB >> 11805635

Unpredictability of cerebrovascular ischemia associated with cervical spine manipulation therapy: a review of sixty-four cases after cervical spine manipulation.

Scott Haldeman1, Frank J Kohlbeck, Marion McGregor.   

Abstract

STUDY
DESIGN: A retrospective review of 64 medicolegal records describing cerebrovascular ischemia after cervical spine manipulation was conducted.
OBJECTIVES: To describe 64 cases of cerebrovascular accidents temporally associated with cervical spine manipulation therapy in terms of patient characteristics, potential risk factors, nature of complication, and neurologic sequelae. SUMMARY OF BACKGROUND DATA: Approximately 117 cases of postmanipulation cerebrovascular ischemia have been reported in the English language literature. Proposed risk factors include age, gender, migraine headaches, hypertension, diabetes, birth control pills, cervical spondylosis, and smoking. It is often assumed that these complications may be avoided by clinically screening patients and by premanipulation positioning of the head and neck to evaluate the patency of the vertebral arteries.
METHODS: Three researchers using a uniform data abstraction instrument performed an independent review of 64 previously unpublished medicolegal records describing cerebrovascular ischemia after cervical spine manipulation. These cases were referred to a single physician for review over a 16-year period from across the United States and Canada. Descriptive statistics were calculated for characteristics of the patients and the complications. Means and standard deviations were computed for continuous variables. Frequencies and proportions were calculated for categorical variables.
RESULTS: This study was unable to identify factors from the clinical history and physical examination of the patient that would assist a physician attempting to isolate the patient at risk of cerebral ischemia after cervical manipulation.
CONCLUSION: Cerebrovascular accidents after manipulation appear to be unpredictable and should be considered an inherent, idiosyncratic, and rare complication of this treatment approach.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805635     DOI: 10.1097/00007632-200201010-00012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)        ISSN: 0362-2436            Impact factor:   3.468


  32 in total

1.  Chiropractic spinal manipulation for back pain.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Br J Sports Med       Date:  2003-06       Impact factor: 13.800

2.  Chiropractic care: attempting a risk-benefit analysis.

Authors:  E Ernst
Journal:  Am J Public Health       Date:  2002-10       Impact factor: 9.308

3.  [Accusations of malpractice in chirotherapeutic treatment].

Authors:  M L Hansis; B Weber; U Smentkowski; P Schräder
Journal:  Orthopade       Date:  2004-09       Impact factor: 1.087

4.  [Pain as sole symptom of carotid artery dissection].

Authors:  A Straube
Journal:  Schmerz       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 1.107

5.  Characterization of side effects sustained by chiropractic students during their undergraduate training in technique class at a chiropractic college: a preliminary retrospective study.

Authors:  Kim Macanuel; Amy Deconinck; Katie Sloma; Monique Ledoux; Brian J Gleberzon
Journal:  J Can Chiropr Assoc       Date:  2005-03

6.  The relation between the spatial distribution of vertebral artery compromise and exposure to cervical manipulation.

Authors:  Gregory N Kawchuk; Gian S Jhangri; Eric L Hurwitz; Shari Wynd; S Haldeman; Michael D Hill
Journal:  J Neurol       Date:  2008-01-15       Impact factor: 4.849

7.  Positive cervical artery testing in a patient with chronic whiplash syndrome: clinical decision-making in the presence of diagnostic uncertainty.

Authors:  David L Graziano; Wanda Nitsch; Peter A Huijbregts
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2007

8.  Manual therapy and cervical arterial dysfunction, directions for the future: a clinical perspective.

Authors:  Roger Kerry; Alan J Taylor; Jeanette Mitchell; Chris McCarthy; John Brew
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2008

9.  Knowledge and pre-thoracic spinal thrust manipulation examination: a survey of current practice in the UK.

Authors:  Nicola R Heneghan; Sally E Davies; Emilio J Puentedura; Alison Rushton
Journal:  J Man Manip Ther       Date:  2018-09-05

10.  Current understanding of the relationship between cervical manipulation and stroke: what does it mean for the chiropractic profession?

Authors:  Donald R Murphy
Journal:  Chiropr Osteopat       Date:  2010-08-03
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.