Literature DB >> 11805581

A population-based prospective cohort study of personal exposure to magnetic fields during pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage.

De-Kun Li1, Roxana Odouli, Soora Wi, Teresa Janevic, Ira Golditch, T Dan Bracken, Russell Senior, Richard Rankin, Richard Iriye.   

Abstract

To study the effect of magnetic fields on the risk of miscarriage, we conducted a population-based prospective cohort study among pregnant women within a large health maintenance organization. All women with a positive pregnancy test at less than 10 weeks of gestation and residing in the San Francisco area were contacted for participation in the study. We conducted in-person interviews to obtain information on risk factors for miscarriage and other potential confounders. All participants were also asked to wear a magnetic field-measuring meter for 24 hours and to keep a diary of their activities. Pregnancy outcomes were obtained for all participants by searching the health maintenance organization's databases, reviewing medical charts, and telephone follow-up. We used the Cox proportional hazard model for examining the magnetic field-miscarriage association. A total of 969 subjects were included in the final analyses. Although we did not observe an association between miscarriage risk and the average magnetic field level, miscarriage risk increased with an increasing level of maximum magnetic field exposure with a threshold around 16 milligauss (mG). The rate ratio (RR) associated with magnetic field exposure > or = 16 mG (vs <16 mG) was 1.8 [95% confidence interval (CI) = 1.2-2.7]. The risk remained elevated for levels (in tertiles) of maximum magnetic field exposure > or = 16 mG. The association was stronger for early miscarriages (<10 weeks of gestation) (RR = 2.2, 95% CI = 1.2-4.0) and among "susceptible" women with multiple prior fetal losses or subfertility (RR = 3.1, 95% CI = 1.3-7.7). After excluding women who indicated that their daily activity pattern during the measurements did not represent their typical daily activity during pregnancy, the association was strengthened; RR = 2.9 (95% CI = 1.6-5.3) for maximum magnetic field exposure > or = 16 mG, RR = 5.7 (95% CI = 2.1-15.7) for early miscarriage, and RR = 4.0 (95% CI = 1.4-11.5) among the susceptible women. Our findings provide strong prospective evidence that prenatal maximum magnetic field exposure above a certain level (possibly around 16 mG) may be associated with miscarriage risk. This observed association is unlikely to be due to uncontrolled biases or unmeasured confounders.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805581     DOI: 10.1097/00001648-200201000-00004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Epidemiology        ISSN: 1044-3983            Impact factor:   4.822


  41 in total

1.  Exposure to electromagnetic fields during pregnancy.

Authors:  Gideon Koren
Journal:  Can Fam Physician       Date:  2003-02       Impact factor: 3.275

2.  Effects of paternal electromagnetic pulse exposure on the reproductive endocrine function of male offspring: a pilot study.

Authors:  Ming-Juan Yang; Hai-Yang Lang; Xia Miao; Hai-Qiang Liu; Yan-Jun Zhang; Ya-Feng Wang; Yong-Bin Chen; Jun-Ye Liu; Li-Hua Zeng; Guo-Zhen Guo
Journal:  Toxicol Res (Camb)       Date:  2018-07-12       Impact factor: 3.524

3.  NSAIDs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: true risks or only suspicions?

Authors:  Benedetta Schiavetti; Antonio Clavenna; Rita Campi; Maurizio Bonati
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2004-01-10

4.  Health response of two communities to military antennae in Cyprus.

Authors:  A W Preece; A G Georgiou; E J Dunn; S C Farrow
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2007-01-25       Impact factor: 4.402

5.  Do multivitamin supplements modify the relationship between prenatal alcohol intake and miscarriage?

Authors:  Lyndsay Ammon Avalos; Lee Ann Kaskutas; Gladys Block; De-Kun Li
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2009-10-20       Impact factor: 8.661

6.  Personal power-frequency magnetic field exposure in women recruited at an infertility clinic: association with physical activity and temporal variability.

Authors:  Ryan C Lewis; Russ Hauser; Lu Wang; Robert Kavet; John D Meeker
Journal:  Radiat Prot Dosimetry       Date:  2015-07-07       Impact factor: 0.972

Review 7.  Reproductive toxicology in occupational settings: an update.

Authors:  R Winker; H W Rüdiger
Journal:  Int Arch Occup Environ Health       Date:  2005-07-12       Impact factor: 3.015

8.  Volume and type of alcohol during early pregnancy and the risk of miscarriage.

Authors:  Lyndsay Ammon Avalos; Sarah C M Roberts; Lee Ann Kaskutas; Gladys Block; De-Kun Li
Journal:  Subst Use Misuse       Date:  2014-05-08       Impact factor: 2.164

9.  Exposure to non-steroidal anti-inflammatory drugs during pregnancy and risk of miscarriage: population based cohort study.

Authors:  De-Kun Li; Liyan Liu; Roxana Odouli
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2003-08-16

10.  Occupational magnetic field exposure among women in Stockholm County, Sweden.

Authors:  U M Forssén; G Mezei; G Nise; M Feychting
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 4.402

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.