Literature DB >> 11805228

Roles of endogenous opioid peptides in modulation of nocifensive response to formalin.

Hsiang-En Wu1, Kuei-Chun Hung, Hirokazu Mizoguchi, Hiroshi Nagase, Leon F Tseng.   

Abstract

Roles of endogenous opioid peptides and their receptors in modulation of the nocifensive responses to formalin in mice were studied. Mice were pretreated i.c.v. or intrathecally (i.t.) with selective opioid receptor antagonists or intrathecally with antisera against endogenous opioid peptides and the nocifensive licking responses to intraplantar injection of formalin (0.5%, 25 microl) were then observed. Pretreatment with the epsilon-opioid receptor antagonist beta-endorphin(1-27) or the selective mu-opioid receptor antagonist D-Phe-Cys-Tyr-Orn-Thr-Pen-Thr-NH(2) (CTOP) given i.c.v. dose dependently enhanced the second, but not the first phase of the nocifensive response. However, i.c.v. pretreatment with the selective delta-receptor antagonist naltrindole or kappa-receptor antagonist nor-binaltrophimine did not affect the nocifensive responses. Intrathecal pretreatment with selective delta(1)-opioid antagonist 7-benzylidene naltrexamine significantly enhanced both the first and second phases of nocifension. Intrathecal pretreatment with CTOP also increased the second but not the first phase of the nocifension. However, i.t. pretreatment with the selective delta(2)-receptor antagonist naltriben or nor-binaltrophimine did not affect the second phase of the nocifension. Intrathecal pretreatment with antiserum against Leu-enkephalin, Met-enkephalin, or dynorphin A(1-17), but not beta-endorphin, enhanced only the second phase of nocifensive response to formalin. It is concluded that the blockade of epsilon- and mu-receptors, but not delta- or kappa-receptors, at the supraspinal sites enhanced the second phase of formalin-induced nocifension. In the spinal cord, Leu-enkephalin, and to a lesser extent, Met-enkephalin and dynorphin A(1-17) and mu- and delta(1)-opioid receptors, but not delta(2)- or kappa-opioid receptors, are involved in modulating the feedback inhibition of the second phase of formalin-induced nocifension.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805228     DOI: 10.1124/jpet.300.2.647

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharmacol Exp Ther        ISSN: 0022-3565            Impact factor:   4.030


  6 in total

Review 1.  Botulinum toxin for the treatment of musculoskeletal pain and spasm.

Authors:  Geoffrey Sheean
Journal:  Curr Pain Headache Rep       Date:  2002-12

2.  Antinociceptive effects of haloperidol and its metabolites in the formalin test in mice.

Authors:  Cruz M Cendán; José M Pujalte; Enrique Portillo-Salido; José M Baeyens
Journal:  Psychopharmacology (Berl)       Date:  2005-10-19       Impact factor: 4.530

3.  Dual effects of intrathecal BAM22 on nociceptive responses in acute and persistent pain--potential function of a novel receptor.

Authors:  Yanguo Hong; Peifang Dai; Jianping Jiang; Xueai Zeng
Journal:  Br J Pharmacol       Date:  2004-01-12       Impact factor: 8.739

4.  Effects of co-administration of intrathecal nociceptin/orphanin FQ and opioid antagonists on formalin-induced pain in rats.

Authors:  Heeseung Lee
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2013-05-01       Impact factor: 2.759

5.  Endogenous kappa-opioid receptor systems inhibit hyperalgesia associated with localized peripheral inflammation.

Authors:  R J Schepers; Janet Lynn Mahoney; Brenda Jean Gehrke; Toni Shaun Shippenberg
Journal:  Pain       Date:  2008-03-19       Impact factor: 7.926

6.  The Effects of Pre-emptive Administration of Ketamine and norBNI on Pain Behavior, c-Fos, and Prodynorphin Protein Expression in the Rat Spinal Cord after Formalin-induced Pain Is Modulated by the DREAM Protein.

Authors:  Idris Long; Rapeah Suppian; Zalina Ismail
Journal:  Korean J Pain       Date:  2013-07-01
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.