Literature DB >> 11805003

Assessment and recommendations on factors contributing to preanalytical variability of urinary pyridinoline and deoxypyridinoline.

Hubert W Vesper1, Laurence M Demers, Richard Eastell, Patrick Garnero, Michael Kleerekoper, Simon P Robins, Apurva K Srivastava, G Russell Warnick, Nelson B Watts, Gary L Myers.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Pyridinoline (PYD) and deoxypyridinoline (DPD) are two of the most extensively characterized biochemical bone markers, but the interpretation of results is hampered by biologic and other preanalytical variability. We reviewed factors contributing to preanalytical variation of pyridinium cross-links in urine.
METHODS: We searched four databases for English-language reports on PYD and/or DPD in urine. Searches were restricted to humans, except for studies of stability, when the search was expanded to other species. The 599 identified articles were supplemented with references from those articles and with articles known to the authors.
RESULTS: The mean reported within-day variability was 71% for PYD (range, 57-78%) and 67% for DPD (range, 53-75%). The mean interday variability was 16% for both DPD and PYD (range for PYD, 12-21%; range for DPD, 5-24%). The mean intersubject variabilities across studies were 26% for PYD (range, 12-63%) and 34% for DPD (range, 8-98%) for healthy premenopausal women and 36% (range, 22-61%) and 40%, (range, 27-54%) for postmenopausal women, respectively. Specimen instability and errors in creatinine measurements were additional sources of variability.
CONCLUSIONS: Intra- and intersubject variability can be reduced by collecting specimens at a specific time of the day and by maintaining similar patient status at each specimen collection regarding factors such as medications and dietary supplements.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11805003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Clin Chem        ISSN: 0009-9147            Impact factor:   8.327


  5 in total

Review 1.  Bone turnover markers: use in osteoporosis.

Authors:  Kim Naylor; Richard Eastell
Journal:  Nat Rev Rheumatol       Date:  2012-06-05       Impact factor: 20.543

2.  Does the cortical bone resorption rate change due to 90Sr-radiation exposure? Analysis of data from Techa Riverside residents.

Authors:  Evgenia I Tolstykh; Natalia B Shagina; Marina O Degteva; Lynn R Anspaugh; Bruce A Napier
Journal:  Radiat Environ Biophys       Date:  2011-04-27       Impact factor: 1.925

3.  Bone mineral density and markers of bone turnover in patients with glycogen storage disease types I, III and IX.

Authors:  J Cabrera-Abreu; N J Crabtree; E Elias; W Fraser; R Cramb; S Alger
Journal:  J Inherit Metab Dis       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 4.982

Review 4.  Circulating markers of bone turnover.

Authors:  Marc G Vervloet; Vincent M Brandenburg
Journal:  J Nephrol       Date:  2017-05-13       Impact factor: 3.902

5.  Medium-Intensity Treadmill Exercise Exerts Beneficial Effects on Bone Modeling Through Bone Marrow Mesenchymal Stromal Cells.

Authors:  Lingli Zhang; Yu Yuan; Wei Wu; Zhongguang Sun; Le Lei; Jing Fan; Bo Gao; Jun Zou
Journal:  Front Cell Dev Biol       Date:  2020-11-24
  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.