Literature DB >> 11804767

Informed consent and decision-making: patients' experiences of the process of recruitment to phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials.

Karen Cox1.   

Abstract

This paper presents an examination of the process of recruitment in cancer clinical trials. This research was undertaken as part of a larger study which sought to assess the psychosocial impact of participation in phases I and II anti-cancer drug trials from the patient's perspective. Through a combination of in-depth interviews with 55 patients who were offered participation in a clinical trial, and reading ease assessments of the written information they were given, patients' experiences of recruitment to the trial and their perceptions of the informed consent process were obtained. The results indicate that patients decisions may be influenced by the way information was presented to them verbally and that the written information was difficult for them to understand. This aspect of the research identified the powerful influence of the verbal consultation when seeking consent for trial involvement, the lack of understanding patients had of what they were taking part in and the need to address the readability of the written information with which they are provided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2002        PMID: 11804767     DOI: 10.1016/s0738-3991(01)00147-1

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Patient Educ Couns        ISSN: 0738-3991


  27 in total

Review 1.  Communication and informed consent in phase 1 trials: a review of the literature.

Authors:  A C Cox; L J Fallowfield; V A Jenkins
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2006-01-28       Impact factor: 3.603

2.  Health literacy and cancer prevention: two new instruments to assess comprehension.

Authors:  Kathleen M Mazor; Douglas W Roblin; Andrew E Williams; Sarah M Greene; Bridget Gaglio; Terry S Field; Mary E Costanza; Paul K J Han; Laura Saccoccio; Josephine Calvi; Erica Cove; Rebecca Cowan
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-01-13

3.  Testing the utility of a cancer clinical trial specific Question Prompt List (QPL-CT) during oncology consultations.

Authors:  Richard F Brown; Carma L Bylund; Yuelin Li; Shawna Edgerson; Phyllis Butow
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2012-03-04

Review 4.  Recommendations for enhancing clinical trials education: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Karen A Stepan; Amy P Gonzalez; Vivian S Dorsey; Debra K Frye; Nita D Pyle; Regina F Smith; Terry A Throckmorton; Louise A Villejo; Scott B Cantor
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 2.037

5.  Do cancer patients fully understand clinical trial participation? A pilot study to assess informed consent and patient expectations.

Authors:  Ricardo J Wray; Jo Ellen Stryker; Eric Winer; George Demetri; Karen M Emmons
Journal:  J Cancer Educ       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.037

6.  Development of a research participants' perception survey to improve clinical research.

Authors:  Jennifer L Yessis; Rhonda G Kost; Laura M Lee; Barry S Coller; David K Henderson
Journal:  Clin Transl Sci       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 4.689

Review 7.  Accepting risk in clinical research: is the gene therapy field becoming too risk-averse?

Authors:  Claire T Deakin; Ian E Alexander; Ian Kerridge
Journal:  Mol Ther       Date:  2009-09-22       Impact factor: 11.454

8.  Communicating and understanding the purpose of pediatric phase I cancer trials.

Authors:  Melissa K Cousino; Stephen J Zyzanski; Amy D Yamokoski; Rebecca A Hazen; Justin N Baker; Robert B Noll; Susan R Rheingold; J Russell Geyer; Stewart C Alexander; Dennis Drotar; Eric D Kodish
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2012-10-15       Impact factor: 44.544

9.  Phase 1 clinical trials in end-stage cancer: patient understanding of trial premises and motives for participation.

Authors:  Tove Godskesen; Peter Nygren; Karin Nordin; Mats Hansson; Ulrik Kihlbom
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-07-18       Impact factor: 3.603

10.  Patients' perception of quality of pre-operative informed consent in athens, Greece: a pilot study.

Authors:  Matthew E Falagas; Patrick D Akrivos; Vangelis G Alexiou; Vasilios Saridakis; Theofanis Moutos; George Peppas; Barbara K Kondilis
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2009-11-26       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.