Literature DB >> 11804737

Substratum nanotopography and the adhesion of biological cells. Are symmetry or regularity of nanotopography important?

A S Curtis1, B Casey, J O Gallagher, D Pasqui, M A Wood, C D Wilkinson.   

Abstract

Animal cells live in environments where many of the features that surround them are on the nanoscale, for example detail on collagen molecules. Do cells react to objects of this size and if so, what features of the molecules are they responding to? Here we show, by fabricating nanometric features in silica and by casting reverse features in polycaprolactone and culturing vertebrate cells in culture upon them, that cells react in their adhesion to the features. With cliffs, adhesion is enhanced at the cliff edge, while pits or pillars in ordered arrays diminish adhesion. The results implicate ordered topography and possibly symmetry effects in the adhesion of cells. Parallel results were obtained in the adhesion of carboxylate-surfaced 2-microm-diameter particles to these surfaces. These results are in agreement with recent predictions from non-biological nanometric systems.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11804737     DOI: 10.1016/s0301-4622(01)00247-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biophys Chem        ISSN: 0301-4622            Impact factor:   2.352


  32 in total

1.  Biological length scale topography enhances cell-substratum adhesion of human corneal epithelial cells.

Authors:  Nancy W Karuri; Sara Liliensiek; Ana I Teixeira; George Abrams; Sean Campbell; Paul F Nealey; Christopher J Murphy
Journal:  J Cell Sci       Date:  2004-07-01       Impact factor: 5.285

2.  The effect of silica nanoparticulate coatings on cellular response.

Authors:  B G Cousins; P J Doherty; R L Williams; J Fink; M J Garvey
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2004-04       Impact factor: 3.896

3.  Nanowire substrate-based laser scanning cytometry for quantitation of circulating tumor cells.

Authors:  Sang-Kwon Lee; Gil-Sung Kim; Yu Wu; Dong-Joo Kim; Yao Lu; Minsuk Kwak; Lin Han; Jung-Hwan Hyung; Jin-Kyeong Seol; Chantal Sander; Anjelica Gonzalez; Jie Li; Rong Fan
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2012-05-31       Impact factor: 11.189

4.  Mimicking the nanostructure of bone matrix to regenerate bone.

Authors:  Robert Kane; Peter X Ma1
Journal:  Mater Today (Kidlington)       Date:  2013-11-01       Impact factor: 31.041

5.  Cellular responses to substrate topography: role of myosin II and focal adhesion kinase.

Authors:  Margo T Frey; Irene Y Tsai; Thomas P Russell; Steven K Hanks; Yu-Li Wang
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-02-24       Impact factor: 4.033

6.  Nanoprinting onto cells.

Authors:  Adam S G Curtis; Matthew J Dalby; Nikolaj Gadegaard
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2006-06-22       Impact factor: 4.118

7.  Measuring cell forces by a photoelastic method.

Authors:  Adam Curtis; Lucia Sokolikova-Csaderova; Gregor Aitchison
Journal:  Biophys J       Date:  2006-12-22       Impact factor: 4.033

Review 8.  Colloidal lithography and current fabrication techniques producing in-plane nanotopography for biological applications.

Authors:  M A Wood
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2007-02-22       Impact factor: 4.118

Review 9.  Modern biomaterials: a review - bulk properties and implications of surface modifications.

Authors:  Paul Roach; David Eglin; Kirsty Rohde; Carole C Perry
Journal:  J Mater Sci Mater Med       Date:  2007-04-19       Impact factor: 3.896

Review 10.  Morphology and electrostatics play active role in neuronal differentiation processes on flexible conducting substrates.

Authors:  Nishit Srivastava; Jackson James; K S Narayan
Journal:  Organogenesis       Date:  2013-11-26       Impact factor: 2.500

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.