Literature DB >> 11804177

Novel technique to average breathing loops for infant respiratory function testing.

G Schmalisch1, M Schmidt, B Foitzik.   

Abstract

Breathing loops can be obtained by plotting two respiratory signals on an x-y diagram: the resulting loops represent a non-parametric description of the respiratory system. In infancy, loops are commonly measured during tidal breathing and their interpretation is hampered by high within-subject variability. Therefore a two-dimensional averaging technique for loops has been developed. The algorithm is based on segmentation of the loops and required two steps. First, the total length of the loop of every breathing cycle was divided into a specified number of equidistant intervals and the co-ordinates calculated by stepwise linear approximation of the curve. Second, averaged loops were calculated using the arithmetical mean (or the median if there were artifacts) of the x and y co-ordinates of the loops for all calculated points. To compare the new technique with averaging in the time domain a simulation study was performed using respiratory signals with a coefficient of variation (CV) of 5%, 10%, 15% and 20%. In contrast to the new technique, with increasing CV, averaging in the time domain led to increasing contortions in the averaged flow-volume loops. Mean errors of peak tidal expiratory flow were -3.3%, -13.9%, -21.3% and -34.2%, whereas errors with the new technique were considerably lower (0.5%, 0.4%, 0.5% and -0.1%) and independent of the level of CV.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2001        PMID: 11804177     DOI: 10.1007/BF02345443

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Biol Eng Comput        ISSN: 0140-0118            Impact factor:   3.079


  15 in total

1.  Influence of inertance on respiratory mechanics measurements in mechanically ventilated puppies.

Authors:  C J Lanteri; F Petak; L Gurrin; P D Sly
Journal:  Pediatr Pulmonol       Date:  1999-08

2.  Variability of tidal breathing flow-volume loops in healthy and sick newborns.

Authors:  U Paetow; D Windstetter; G Schmalisch
Journal:  Am J Perinatol       Date:  1999       Impact factor: 1.862

Review 3.  Neonatal acute respiratory failure.

Authors:  J Gnanaratnem; N N Finer
Journal:  Curr Opin Pediatr       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 2.856

4.  Methods for averaging irregular respiratory flow profiles in awake humans.

Authors:  J Sato; P A Robbins
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  2001-02

5.  [Interactive computer program for separating respiratory pressure in newborn infants into its elastic, viscous and inert components].

Authors:  B Foitzik; M Schmidt; H Proquitté; G Schmalisch
Journal:  Biomed Tech (Berl)       Date:  1998       Impact factor: 1.411

6.  Individuality of breathing patterns in adults assessed over time.

Authors:  G Benchetrit; S A Shea; T P Dinh; S Bodocco; P Baconnier; A Guz
Journal:  Respir Physiol       Date:  1989-02

7.  Pulmonary mechanics in infants. Methodological aspects.

Authors:  H Ahlström; B Jonson
Journal:  Scand J Respir Dis       Date:  1974

Review 8.  Measuring respiratory outcome.

Authors:  A Greenough
Journal:  Semin Neonatol       Date:  2000-05

9.  Is breathing in infants chaotic? Dimension estimates for respiratory patterns during quiet sleep.

Authors:  M Small; K Judd; M Lowe; S Stick
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1999-01

10.  Bifurcations of the respiratory pattern associated with reduced lung volume in the rat.

Authors:  M Sammon; J R Romaniuk; E N Bruce
Journal:  J Appl Physiol (1985)       Date:  1993-08
View more
  2 in total

1.  Early lung function testing in infants with aortic arch anomalies identifies patients at risk for airway obstruction.

Authors:  Charles Christoph Roehr; Silke Wilitzki; Bernd Opgen-Rhein; Karim Kalache; Hans Proquitté; Christoph Bührer; Gerd Schmalisch
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2011-09-23       Impact factor: 3.240

2.  Differences in tidal breathing between infants with chronic lung diseases and healthy controls.

Authors:  G Schmalisch; S Wilitzki; R R Wauer
Journal:  BMC Pediatr       Date:  2005-09-08       Impact factor: 2.125

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.